User talk:Nadkars1/sandbox

Hi. It is not clear from your answers which plant articles you are thinking about evaluating. Make some new sections with a link to the article and the things that you want to improve. That way you can start collecting references to see which one will be best for expanding substantially. Lethornton (talk) 22:33, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It seems that you have looked at a lot of material in thinking about what you want to write, but it is not clear what material you will actually use. You need to transition your conversational tone for planning the article to a more informational tone that shows what information will be included. There are a few places where you seem to be debating taking a high-level, all encompassing view, or talking about specific examples. To meet the requirements of this assignment, you need to get specific examples explained so that you can show how primary research papers inform the general topic you are addressing. Keep working on refining your text. Lethornton (talk) 22:01, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

NOTE Your peer reviewer comments are in your regular talk page and not the talk page for your sandbox. Make sure you go there to see them.Lethornton (talk) 17:03, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Instructor notes You have amassed a lot of information with clear descriptions of the bioactive compounds and their uses. It seems that this page might not be the best place for your work. The note in the talk section refers to an older use of the term phytopharmacology, which meant to treat plant diseases. Modern uses of the word refer to medicinal chemicals from plants. You need to carefully consider the herbalism section and the medicinal plant sections. I think your work would be better to flesh out the medicinal plant page. It would be nice if you could write a bit on the phytopharmacology page to explain the terminology. Lethornton (talk) 17:48, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]