User talk:Nader Torki

Please do not post copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder, as you did to LINKdotNET. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details on the article Talk page and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:LINKdotNET with a link to where we can find that note;
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on the article Talk page. Alternatively, you may create a note on your web page releasing the work under the GFDL and then leave a note at Talk:LINKdotNET with a link to the details.

Otherwise, you are encouraged to rewrite this article in your own words to avoid any copyright infringement. After you do so, you should place a {{hangon}} tag on the article page and leave a note at Talk:LINKdotNET saying you have done so. An administrator will review the new content before taking action.

It is also important that all Wikipedia articles have an encyclopedic tone and follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. FisherQueen (Talk) 11:03, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

May 2007

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices, as you did with LINKdotNET. Please use the {{hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion. Thank you. — Indon (reply) — 11:06, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from articles that you have created yourself, as you did with LINKdotNET. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -FisherQueen (Talk) 11:10, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add commercial material to Wikipedia, as you did to LINKdotNET. While objective prose about products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Thank you. _{–Danielgrad 11:20, 24 May 2007 (UTC)}[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Ldn.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Ldn.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 15:21, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of LINKdotNET

The article LINKdotNET has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no reliably-sourced claims of notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TJRC (talk) 18:14, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]