User talk:Nadagoose28

Shoreface

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Shoreface, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://encyclopedia2.thefreedictionary.com/shoreface.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 18:56, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oooops. Nadagoose28 (talk) 19:01, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with Shoreface

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Shoreface, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://encyclopedia2.thefreedictionary.com/shoreface. As a copyright violation, Shoreface appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Shoreface has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Shoreface and send an email with the message to permissions-enwikimedia.org. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at Talk:Shoreface with a link to where we can find that note.
If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Shoreface.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. VernoWhitney (talk) 13:59, 2 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Reverted edits

Welcome and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page Adriaen Block worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead. Thank you. --Jezebel'sPonyo ^{bons mots} 18:51, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Lol. Nadagoose28 (talk) 18:54, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

October 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Francis Drake, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Francis Drake was changed by Nadagoose28 (u) (t) deleting 44993 characters on 2010-10-20T18:34:39+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 18:34, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Francis Drake, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Favonian (talk) 18:39, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Alexander von Humboldt has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Wayne Olajuwon chat 16:17, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Enough is enough

This is the only warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits.

If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. --Jezebel'sPonyo ^{bons mots} 16:20, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked indefinitely

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. PhilKnight (talk) 16:32, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]