User talk:NachoSchoolBus
Your comment on Jgstokes
[edit]Do you really think it's a good idea to make personal attacks about an editor who you yourself are accusing of being uncivil and passive aggressive? I hope you see the irony in that. I had a delighting conversation with Jgstokes and I think others would to if they simply remember to assume good faith. I'm not religious either but everyone, regardless of their spiritual affiliation, has the right to edit Wikipedia. โโ๐๐ผ๐ฟ๐บ๐ฎ๐น๐๐๐ฑ๐ฒ(talk) 22:14, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
Yes, I do think it's a good idea. As a matter of fact, it's a great idea. Now, go get undressed and walk across the street. NachoSchoolBus (talk) 22:49, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
- If you're trying to get blocked, you'll need to insult me better than that. Obviously you're a WP:SOCK. โโ๐๐ผ๐ฟ๐บ๐ฎ๐น๐๐๐ฑ๐ฒ(talk) 22:53, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
I'm not trying to get blocked, you slap-happy feral cat. NachoSchoolBus (talk) 23:04, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
- NachoSchoolBus you wouldn't know it, the way you're doubling down and assuming bad faith. โโ๐๐ผ๐ฟ๐บ๐ฎ๐น๐๐๐ฑ๐ฒ(talk) 23:06, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
Please, stop vandalizing my talk page. I'll report you. You've been warned. NachoSchoolBus (talk) 23:07, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
- NachoSchoolBus talk pages are for discussion, and that's what I'm doing. It's not at all WP:VANDALISM. If you want me to stop commenting though: bye โโ๐๐ผ๐ฟ๐บ๐ฎ๐น๐๐๐ฑ๐ฒ(talk) 23:09, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
I'd love to continue this conversation over a warm beer. Do you by chance live in Clovis, New Mexico? NachoSchoolBus (talk) 23:10, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
- Unfortunately I don't and the closest I've been is Albuquerque, a long time ago. And I'd prefer a cold beer if you're buying. โโ๐๐ผ๐ฟ๐บ๐ฎ๐น๐๐๐ฑ๐ฒ(talk) 23:12, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
Consider it done! I'll meet you in your home town in half an hour. NachoSchoolBus (talk) 23:13, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
- NachoSchoolBus Eh I'm more than half an hour, I live in northern California. โโ๐๐ผ๐ฟ๐บ๐ฎ๐น๐๐๐ฑ๐ฒ(talk) 23:14, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
How about tomorrow? NachoSchoolBus (talk) 23:16, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
- Tell you what, you come here, I'll buy you a nice toasty joint. I hear that recreation is pretty new to you New Mexicans. โโ๐๐ผ๐ฟ๐บ๐ฎ๐น๐๐๐ฑ๐ฒ(talk) 23:16, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
No. I don't smoke weed. I'm 87 years old NachoSchoolBus (talk) 23:17, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
- Sounds like a good reason to start if you ask me. XD โโ๐๐ผ๐ฟ๐บ๐ฎ๐น๐๐๐ฑ๐ฒ(talk) 23:18, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
Great, now I'm blocked. Can you help an 87 year old brother out? NachoSchoolBus (talk) 23:21, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
- I have to say you probably deserve a temporary block based on Wikipedia policy. Probably not indefinite though. โโ๐๐ผ๐ฟ๐บ๐ฎ๐น๐๐๐ฑ๐ฒ(talk) 23:23, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
WP:DUCK. I suspect a sock account, as you yourself did also. -- Longhair\talk 23:24, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
- On those grounds the indefinite block is certainly acceptable. โโ๐๐ผ๐ฟ๐บ๐ฎ๐น๐๐๐ฑ๐ฒ(talk) 23:39, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
- Based on this edit, imo this is obviously a sock of GeraldFord1980 (see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/GeraldFord1980/Archive). --FyzixFighter (talk) 02:21, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
July 2021
[edit]{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. ย Longhair\talk 23:17, 30 July 2021 (UTC)`
August 2021
[edit]Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.