Jump to content

User talk:NaBUru38/Archive 3

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Category:Liftbacks

[edit]

Category:Liftbacks, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 18:39, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Pablo Cuevas, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Robert Farah and Alejandro González. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bracket Errors on 13 June

[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Hispanic may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "()"s and 1 "<>"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • ** [[Isleño]])<
  • ** [[Cuban-American lobby]])</small>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:48, 13 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ben Hogan Award, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Colonial Country Club. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Golf in the United States, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pat Bradley. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:38, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Great thoughts on education

[edit]

I liked your comment on the Signpost article the other day. I'm new to the foundation, and have only been a Wikipedian for a few years. You said, "Technology is a tool, the strategic goals are educational.". I agree and am going to print this out and put it on my wall - to keep it fresh in my mind! CKoerner (WMF) (talk) 17:02, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome, CKoerner!
Of course we need tech people to run the Wikimedia websites. But technology is supposed to help us to write and share. I'm afraid that this knowledge engine sounds like it could create and select content automatically, which means instead of people.
We at the Wikimedia community try to encourage and help people around the world to learn about the world. So we take a little spare time each week to write texts, take photos and make videos.
And on top of that, we encourage people to become members of the community. The board is meant to help the Wikimedia community to do that. --NaBUru38 (talk) 00:37, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Cycling competitions by country

[edit]

Please see my proposal to upmerge the “cycling competitions” categories to “cycle races” categories eg Category:Cycling competitions by country to Category:Cycle races by country. Hugo999 (talk) 04:29, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Arizona State Fairgrounds, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fairgrounds. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:05, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Re: list of male tennis players

[edit]

What of the double-up caused by players who play both singles and doubles? This was very common prior to our current era. Rovingrobert (talk) 09:28, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Search engine (computing), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Search query. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:59, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Sport in Europe
added links pointing to Italian Open, Georgia and Tom Kristensen
Golf in the United States
added a link pointing to Springfield, New Jersey

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:09, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to "target countries" discussion

[edit]

Hello, NaBUru38! Since you attended the Global South meeting at Wikimania 2016, we're inviting you to a discussion on "target countries". You can help the product team at the Wikimedia Foundation create a new list of countries and metrics to replace the "global south" concept in our process with something more relevant. Interested? Learn more about this discussion and share your perspective. (This message is available in more languages.) Joe Sutherland (WMF) (talk) 00:17, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sport in Canada icon change

[edit]

I'll be happy to help with this. I left messages at Portal talk:Sport in Canada and Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Canadian sport. I'll make the change if nobody objects. Meanwhile, would you be willing to add {{unlinked}} beneath the license on the file description page? It's completely optional, but would improve the experience for visually impaired users. Matt Fitzpatrick (talk) 17:54, 9 November 2016 (UTC) [reply]

Done Matt Fitzpatrick (talk) 21:26, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, Matt! --NaBUru38 (talk) 19:44, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, NaBUru38. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Want to help shape the future of the Wikipedia editing experience?

[edit]

Hi NaBUru38!

Thanks for responding to Whatamidoing's request for editors. The Design Research team at the Wikimedia Foundation is currently seeking Wikipedians for user studies about their experience with current editing tools and to test out some prototype editing tools. If you’re interested in helping to shape the future of editing on Wikipedia, we would love to have you participate! The study session will take approximately 30 minutes, maximum of 45 minutes.

The study will take place in the next couple weeks, and will require participants to have access to a webcam and microphone (or a laptop with built in cam & mic), with a quiet place to go for a research session. Please email dchen[at]wikimedia.org and include the following information:

  • Username NaBUru38
  • Email where we can reach you
  • Your city or time zone Uruguay (UTC-3)
  • Best time to talk to you

Please let me know if you have any questions! Look forward to hearing from you.

Sincerely,

Daisy Chen

User Experience Researcher Dchen (WMF) (talk) 18:16, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

2017 Currie Cup qualification

[edit]

Hi there, you raised a request for this article to be created. The competition was replaced in 2017 by the 2017 SuperSport Rugby Challenge, which has now been created. Thanks, TheMightyPeanut (talk) 06:52, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sport in Europe, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Roma. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:56, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Grand Slam (NASCAR), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Winston 500. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:48, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Richard (football) listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Richard (football). Since you had some involvement with the Richard (football) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Clarityfiend (talk) 07:55, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Firstly - Wow! That's quite some trick with the wiki magic. I've not seen anything like it before and it was an interesting detour to find out about mw:Extension:Labeled Section Transclusion.

Unfortunately it looks like the article has some problems.

  • It's too big. When {{Reflist}} won't resolve into a list of references because of the page size you know you've got a problem, and it's not just a matter of aesthetic opinion.
Perhaps (given that the title is "by state") removing the territories would get the article down to a size where things start to work again - but I doubt it.
  • From the hidden categories that have been thrown up it would appear that a number of the articles you've put together have used the same names for their named references, meaning that your composite article has duplicate reference names which won't resolve.

Until the article starts to function more like a normal wiki article it's hard to offer any more useful review comments. Hope that helps, Cabayi (talk) 23:06, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article History of the United States by state has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Page is too large and contains content included on other pages.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Power~enwiki (talk) 23:14, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, NaBUru38. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hey! Based on your edits to NationStates, I thought maybe you would be interested that I started a series of userboxes for the game NationStates. Feel free to add any or add your own!-🐦Do☭torWho42 () 05:26, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, DoctorWho42! I haven't played that game in like a decade. Also I'm over the infobox fade. Good luck! --NaBUru38 (talk) 17:34, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sports numbers

[edit]

Hello and thanks for your edits such as this adding sports numbers. After a detailed discussion last year at Talk:1#Retired Player Numbers, we filtered a mass of sports numbers down to just those numbers permanently retired by a major league (per Wikipedia:WikiProject Numbers#Numbers in sports) and moved it into its own article: List of retired numbers. It's not obvious where best to keep other jersey number information that is related more to the sport than to the mathematical properties of the number. Perhaps we need another new article. Any thoughts? Certes (talk) 21:27, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Certes! Thanks for writing to me.
I understand that the articles 1 (number) and 10 (number) shouldn't have a list of every sports competitor who wore those nunmbers. However, I have started with number 35, so the list of notable competitors is rather short. I would like to continue adding these, are you opposed to it?
I don't fully understand which new article you are proposing. I mean, racecar numbers are very rarely retired, so they won't appear on List of retired numbers. Are you proposing a full list of notable sports numbers, including not retired numbers?
See you, NaBUru38 (talk) 16:54, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure of the best way forward. I've asked for help at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Numbers. Certes (talk) 17:06, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sports and rodeo categories

[edit]

Hi NaBUru, just a friendly note regarding these categories. You are the knowledgeable one regarding the sports categories. I work in the rodeo area. I just want to understand a couple things so in future I add articles to the correct ones. But first of all, I want to make sure there is consistency in the categories: Sports in Las Vegas and Sports competitions in Las Vegas. I noticed you moved a few around. You moved the two PRCA articles: i.e., the National Finals Rodeos articles and one of the PBR tour articles (Unleash the Beast Series) articles to the competition category. But you left some PBR and PRCA articles in the Sports in Las Vegas category. What is criteria for deciding which ones belong in each category? The two PBR articles are easy to tell from the titles. The two PRCA articles are the Professional Rodeo Cowboys Association. I am not challenging the moves, just want to understand, thanks! dawnleelynn(talk) 19:33, 2 March 2018 (UTC) ProRodeo Hall of Fame.[reply]

Hello, dawnleelynn! First of all, I changed the categories of hundreds of articles, so I may have made some mistakes.
The "sports competitions" categories are meant to include articles about competitions. Therefore, Category:Sports competitions in London includes articles such as London Marathon‎, London Grand Prix, London ePrix and 2012 Summer Olympics‎. Meanwhile, other subcategories of Category:Sport in London include articles about sports-related subjects that are not competitions, for example Chelsea F.C.‎, London Stadium and Rio Ferdinand.
However, some articles are ambiguous. For example, the National Basketball Association is an association, but it organizes a competition also called NBA.
A similar problem happens with the Professional Rodeo Cowboys Association, which is the name for both the association and the competition. In this case, I preferred to be cautious, and keep the article in Category:Sports in Las Vegas.
However, Professional Bull Riders is an association that organizes competitions like the Unleash the Beast Series and the Velocity Tour. Therefore, it was easy to decide to keep the PBR article in "Sports in Las Vegas", and move "Unleash the Beast Series" to "Sports competitions in Las Vegas".
Actually, neither of those articles really belong to "Sports in Las Vegas" or its categories, because those series host events at multiple venues. Instead, the article that belongs there is PBR World Finals, just like National Finals Rodeo. But it's a redirect, not a standalone article, so I'm not opposed to keep the other articles there.
My recommendation is that you create a standalone article about the PBR World Finals, and remove the other articles from "Sports in Las Vegas".
I hope that you understand this long description. Good luck! --NaBUru38 (talk) 20:58, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
NaBUru38 Oh, thank you that is most helpful and took you a bit of time to write all that up, I'm sure. I think I follow everything. I didn't realize that there was a redirect page of PBR World Finals to the PBR article. That's most helpful. There is actually a website for the PBR World Finals. And, actually, I just noted to write up an article for the PRCA steer roping finals separate from the National Finals Rodeo. Not many realize it's a separate event, the National Finals Steer Roping (NFSR). When I write that up, I will add it where the NFR article is. I think adding a finals article for the PBR is a good idea so I will add that to my list. It doesn't need to be super long. Once that is written, we can revisit what you said about where those two articles not really belonging where they are and putting the new article there instead. Thanks a bunch. I should be able to write something up within a couple weeks or so. I've just done a lot of expanding the PBR articles, found some great media guides, and have plenty of source material. Have a great weekend! dawnleelynn(talk) 21:15, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Sports competitors has been nominated for discussion

[edit]
Category:Sports competitors, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Paul_012 (talk) 09:28, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Super2000

[edit]

Hi, You may want to fix this edit. --Pelmeen10 (talk) 19:02, 2 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oops! Thanks for the tip, Pelmeen10. Good luck! --NaBUru38 (talk) 21:31, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to WikiProject Portals

[edit]

The Portals WikiProject has been rebooted.

You are invited to join, and participate in the effort to revitalize and improve the Portal system and all the portals in it.

There are sections on the WikiProject page dedicated to tasks (including WikiGnome tasks too), and areas on the talk page for discussing the improvement and automation of the various features of portals.

Many complaints have been lodged in the RfC to delete all portals, pointing out their various problems. They say that many portals are not maintained, or have fallen out of date, are useless, etc. Many of the !votes indicate that the editors who posted them simply don't believe in the potential of portals anymore.

It's time to change all that. Let's give them reasons to believe in portals, by revitalizing them.

The best response to a deletion nomination is to fix the page that was nominated. The further underway the effort is to improve portals by the time the RfC has run its course, the more of the reasons against portals will no longer apply. RfCs typically run 30 days. There are 19 days left in this one. Let's see how many portals we can update and improve before the RfC is closed, and beyond.

A healthy WikiProject dedicated to supporting and maintaining portals may be the strongest argument of all not to delete.

We may even surprise ourselves and exceed all expectations. Who knows what we will be able to accomplish in what may become the biggest Wikicollaboration in years.

Let's do this.

See ya at the WikiProject!

Sincerely,    — The Transhumanist   10:22, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much

[edit]

The RfC discussion to eliminate portals was closed May 12, with the statement "There exists a strong consensus against deleting or even deprecating portals at this time." This was made possible because you and others came to the rescue. Thank you for speaking up.

By the way, the current issue of the Signpost features an article with interviews about the RfC and the Portals WikiProject.

I'd also like to let you know that the Portals WikiProject is working hard to make sure your support of portals was not in vain. Toward that end, we have been working diligently to innovate portals, while building, updating, upgrading, and maintaining them. The project has grown to 80 members so far, and has become a beehive of activity.

Our two main goals at this time are to automate portals (in terms of refreshing, rotating, and selecting content), and to develop a one-page model in order to make obsolete and eliminate most of the 150,000 subpages from the portal namespace by migrating their functions to the portal base pages, using technologies such as selective transclusion. Please feel free to join in on any of the many threads of development at the WikiProject's talk page, or just stop by to see how we are doing. If you have any questions about portals or portal development, that is the best place to ask them.

If you would like to keep abreast of developments on portals, keep in mind that the project's members receive updates on their talk pages. The updates are also posted here, for your convenience.

Again, we can't thank you enough for your support of portals, and we hope to make you proud of your decision. Sincerely,    — The Transhumanist   10:38, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

P.S.: if you reply to this message, please {{ping}} me. Thank you. -TT

Linking

[edit]

Hi, thanks for your work. Please remember that years, dates, and other common terms are not normally linked on en.WP. Tony (talk) 09:30, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2018 in combat sports, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Joseph Parker and Sergey Kovalev (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, NaBUru38. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Video tutorial regarding Wikipedia referencing with VisualEditor

[edit]

Hi, I have received a grant from WMF to support production of a video tutorial regarding creating references with VisualEditor. I anticipate that the video will be published in March 2019. If this tutorial is well received then I may produce additional tutorials in the future for English Wikipedia and possibly other projects such as Commons and Spanish Wikipedia. If you would like to receive notifications on your talk page when drafts and finished products from this project are ready for review, then please sign up for the project newsletter.
Regards, --Pine 00:33, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]