User talk:NZUlysses

This user may have left Wikipedia. NZUlysses has not edited Wikipedia since 2014. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Welcome!

Hello, NZUlysses, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! , SqueakBox 05:36, 5 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Autoblock

{unblock-auto|1=130.216.30.233|2=Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Enoch08". The reason given for Enoch08's block is: "user hates Wikipedia".|3=DragonflySix tyseven|4=672701}

This block is unfair, not only because this IP is a university and it's blocking everyone here (or at least everyone at this dorm) but more importantly, "user hates Wikipedia" isn't a valid reason for blocking a person's IP surely? Perhaps you have a rogue moderator?

Y	Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s): Autoblock of 130.216.30.233 lifted or expired. Request handled by: Sandstein 07:57, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ah

Sorry about that - you got caught in the autoblock, mea culpa. If you look at Enoch08's last few contributions before being blocked, I think you'll agree that "hates Wikipedia" is a fair description. DS 14:19, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Religious fanaticism

An editor has nominated Religious fanaticism, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Religious fanaticism (2nd nomination) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:59, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Clarity of scripture

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Clarity of scripture, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.theopedia.com/Perspicuity_of_Scripture. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 23:56, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Clarity of scripture, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.theopedia.com/Perspicuity_of_Scripture. As a copyright violation, Clarity of scripture appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Clarity of scripture has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Clarity of scripture and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Clarity of scripture with a link to where we can find that note.
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Clarity of scripture.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. David (talk) 23:59, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of Speedy Deletion

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Clarity of scripture, a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a {{hangon}} tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you.

You maybe interested in the Article Rescue Squadron

Hello, NZUlysses. Based on the templates on your talk page, please consider joining the Article Rescue Squadron. Rescue Squadron members are focused on rescuing articles for deletion, that might otherwise be lost forever. I think you will find our project matches your vision of Wikipedia. You can join >> here <<.

Ikip (talk) 18:43, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of U.S. states by Gini coefficient of income inequality for deletion

A discussion has begun about whether the article List of U.S. states by Gini coefficient of income inequality, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of U.S. states by Gini coefficient of income inequality until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Student7 (talk) 11:29, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of U.S. states by Gini coefficient of income inequality for deletion

The article List of U.S. states by Gini coefficient of income inequality is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of U.S. states by Gini coefficient of income inequality until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Student7 (talk) 23:45, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

奥克兰大学 listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 奥克兰大学. Since you had some involvement with the 奥克兰大学 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - The ChampionMan 1234 02:59, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to an in-person meetup in Mohua / Golden Bay

Thinking about your summer break? Think about joining other Wikipedians and Wikimedians in Golden Bay / Mohua! Details are on the meetup page. There's heaps of interesting stuff to work on e.g. the oldest extant waka or New Zealand's oldest ongoing legal case. Or you may spend your time taking photos and then upload them.

Golden Bay is hard to get to and the airline flying into Tākaka uses small planes, so we are holding some seats from and to Wellington and we are offering attendees a $200 travel subsidy to help with costs.

Be in touch with Schwede66 if this event interests you and you'd like to discuss logistics. Schwede 66 09:14, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]