User talk:NYC 55david

Third Watch Profiles

Hey, just to let you know I like the profiles you've been typing up! ;-) Hill Valley Telegraph

thanks! youurs were good too!

License tagging for Image:Ty3.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Ty3.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 05:10, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Kill Phil 2 0001.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Kill Phil 2 0001.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:08, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

Fernando Alonso

Please stop. If you continue to vandalise Wikipedia, as you did to Fernando Alonso, you will be blocked. 4u1e 07:48, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Ben Waterworth

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Ben Waterworth, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Ben Waterworth seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Ben Waterworth, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 21:32, 29 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Kim4.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Kim4.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 18:03, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Bosco2.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Bosco2.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:08, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Dtwcastdoc.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Dtwcastdoc.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 21:20, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Anthony Moran

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Anthony Moran, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Anthony Moran. Dravecky (talk) 07:07, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:12012008068.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:12012008068.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. O sama K^{Reply? on my talk page, please} 00:13, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:12012008066.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:12012008066.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. O sama K^{Reply? on my talk page, please} 00:14, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Hobart2020Logo1.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Hobart2020Logo1.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 09:55, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Hobart2020Logo1.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Hobart2020Logo1.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 12:53, 7 January 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:53, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Hobart2020Logo1.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Hobart2020Logo1.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:53, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hobart Olympic BId

Cut this nonsense out, or you will soon be blocked from editing. Wikipedia is not a place to promote your little internet meme of the week. -- Mattinbgn\^talk 12:27, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your editing has not gone unnoticed. There are many places that may be bidding for the 2020 olympics. If an official entry is made, then it passes the notability threshold and should be included. As there is some dissent over the inclusion at the moment, I suggest that this is discussed on the talk page of the article and consensus gained for inclusion before you re-add the info. You are already over WP:3RR, so consider this an absolute final warning. Mjroots (talk) 12:38, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re your remarks on my talk page. The bit that is wrong is edit warring. I'm not sure that an intention to bid passes the notability threshold, although the reporting of such intention by 3rd party sources would strengthen the case for inclusion. There is WP:NORUSH to get the info in today, or tomorrow. If it takes a while to gather consensus then you'll need to wait a bit. That said, I'll also drop Bidgee a note re reverting and the need for discussion. I don't like having to block editors where it is avoidable, which I'd like to remain the case here, so please discuss this issue and try to reach a consensus over what is includable and what sources are usable. Mjroots (talk) 13:26, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

(Also posted at the Australian noticeboard, and Tasmanian)

Ahah legitimacy - a few people in Tasmania are capable of creating a semblance of legitimacy by having a web page presence, facebook page and a few newspaper articles on an item - I would suggest information is never particularly straight forward - the actual proposal was in fact an april fools joke (the state of Tasmania has less than 500.000 population - the prospect of an isolated state on the outer side of the planet being capable of attracting either the money, facility or infrastructure for such a bid is close to absurd) - to give credence to the gullible - facebook, and newspaper cites alone may look 'good' and 'valid' - but ahh, I used to live in a part of Tasmania that had the marvellous total population of less then 5,000 people at any one time in the last 50 years.

The interesting thing is it did start out as a joke - see http://www.gamesbids.com/eng/olympic_bids/future_bids_2016/1216135135.html - and like chinese whispers and good media stories that run beyond the original intent and take on a life of their own - there are people who move it up a rung to try to keep the story going - I would suggest that any inclusion of such an item needs to be qualified specifically as to what it started out as - and that the probability of anyone in Australia being prepared to support the bid as being next not nothing and not even something a betting person could even start to make odds on - Tasmanians cannot even vote on a clear majority government Tasmanian state election, 2010 due to the Hare-Clark voting system, I suspect they will be preoccupied with many other things other than finding the finance for Olympic bids in the near future

Please note - if you insert that again you are beyond WP:3RR and will probably be blocked - I would strongly suggest you give it a break - or qualify very clearly that it started out as an April Fools joke Satu Suro 14:00, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hobart article

I have also reverted that item - unless it very specifically explains that the issue began as an April Fools joke - then I suggest you do not re-insert the item. Just because things take on their own life with web pages and facebook pages does not mean that the information actually represents a genuine bid for the olympics Satu Suro 14:18, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please read WP:NOT and anything about the issue of using wikipedia as a soapbox. Please do not assume anything about other editors also, I am one of the few regular editors on the WP Tasmania project - and also have been in Hobart and Launceston regularly over the last 5 years - unless you come up with WP:RS - that is reliable third party sources about what you perceive as a legitimate bid for the olympics - then leave it out. Affirming that anybody or any government body or representative is interested is not the same as a sanctioned bid that has the signed support of both federal and state governments for such an item/bid. Satu Suro 07:52, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/NYC 55david for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Bidgee (talk) 14:20, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

3RR warning

I'm going to assume good faith that you haven't previously been warned about the 3RR policy, so here we go: you cannot perform more the three reversions on any articles in 24 hours, with very limited exceptions. Doing so with a mix of logged-out and logged-in edits is even worse, as it makes it appear that you are logging in and out to avoid detection. WP:3RR and WP:SOCK are the relevant policies. If I detect further edit-warring on these articles by you or by IPs that have been identified as you, you will be blocked from editing.—Kww(talk) 06:10, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Self-promotion

I've blocked your account. I've had a look at your edits and you've been editing in a very disruptive way for a long time. I'm also concerned with edit summaries and descriptions you wrote for photos you uploaded under a "pd-self" claim which stated "‎Ben Waterworth is author". This would suggest that you are claiming you are Ben Waterworth, which places a rather unpleasant spin on your editing history here. Looking at your live and deleted edits, you've been using this account since 2006 to spam Wikipedia with material about yourself, your projects and other interests. This is a blatant misuse of Wikipedia and it needs to stop immediately. I am willing to unblock you and give you another chance but it will be under the condition that you do not post any further autobiographies about yourself, biographies about your friends or other articles about your personal projects and interests. You will be welcome to make content suggestions on talk pages of existing articles that are related to you but you're not welcome to continue editing articles related to yourself, your family, friends and uni mates and other subjects with which you have a close connection until you have demonstrated you understand Wikipedia's rules and are willing and able to abide by them. Please read the Conflict of Interest, Notability criteria for journalists and Self-promotion and publicity guidelines and consider whether you and your mates and these other subjects you're trying to promote actually meet Wikipedia's inclusion rules and even qualify for inclusion here. Sarah 12:48, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:BrinkBanner08small.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:BrinkBanner08small.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 21:02, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:BrinkBanner2.JPG listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:BrinkBanner2.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 21:03, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:AnthSmall.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:AnthSmall.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 21:14, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:TheBrinkLogo2.JPG

The file File:TheBrinkLogo2.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused logo with no article used, it's also can't move to commons because of an unused logo will be deleted as of out of project scope.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Willy1018 (talk) 15:06, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]