Jump to content

User talk:NWeigel

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

NWeigel, you are invited to the Teahouse!

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi NWeigel! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Lectonar (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 27 October 2018 (UTC)

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello, NWeigel, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Ian and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.

Handouts
Additional Resources
  • You can find answers to many student questions on our Q&A site, ask.wikiedu.org

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 19:02, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Pat's Peer Review (Copied by NWeigel from User talk:NWeigel/sandbox)

[edit]

The article is not grammatically correct or clear in what it is saying, so it is very hard to understand. There is also no clear structure to the article, so that can definitely be improved. It can be expanded to add more information.

I agree that the article is not grammatically correct in certain places. I am planning on completely rewriting that section of the articale. I am going to give the article a more structured format and expand it to add more information. --NWeigel (talk) 04:15, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Seth's Peer Review (Copied by NWeigel from User talk:NWeigel/sandbox)

[edit]

You have made good progress fixing the problems with the article. I can see you worked on the grammar and made sure to keep things consistent in the article. I also liked how you organized the article into the lead and the manufacturing of the bulk moulding compound. Some work still needs to be done to the second half of the manufacturing paragraph. It is still hard to follow. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sjo uml (talkcontribs) 04:41, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that the second part of the manufacturing paragraph is still hard to follow, and I plan to completely rewrite that section. --NWeigel (talk) 02:00, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]