User talk:NR16NB

hello, I agree with you, it was frustrating to experience immediate wholesale deletion of factually correct material rather than contact me to discuss, I am advised (by a real/ official editor) discussion is the preferred route.Observer900 (talk) 16:37, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

There appears to be some mileage in adding content to/ correcting/ improving New Buckenham page. You appear near the place which suggest you actually know something about it, I too know it well. subject to 'referencing' and 'sourcing' are you interested to collaborate ? Observer900 (talk) 17:19, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

hello, your input to New Buckenham and deletion of it noted, that user is very persistent in blocking/ ';reverting' any changes to the page and has 'warnings' for it. From your postcode I assume you're local to that place. I have tried to 'talk' to that user to discuss and not been successful. There are guidance pages you can refer to about editing and sources/ referencing. Good luck. Observer900 (talk) 19:45, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]