User talk:NELKBOYZZ
Welcome!
[edit]
|
March 2020
[edit]Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like you to assume good faith while interacting with other editors, which you did not do on User talk:Eyer. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Doug Weller talk 08:42, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
@Doug Weller: If assume good faith is your defense for their action I guess they haven’t read it because it clearly states “Unless there is clear evidence to the contrary, assume that people who work on the project are trying to help it, not hurt it.”
NELKBOYZZ (talk) 15:53, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
Hello. Your recent edit to Oviedo, Florida appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. John from Idegon (talk) 22:53, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
April 2020
[edit]Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
— Berean Hunter (talk) 17:19, 12 April 2020 (UTC)