User talk:NCurse/Archive7

BUÉK. Összekoszolom ezt a frissen letakarított lapot. :) hu:Vita:Lucius Cornelius Scipio. Segíts már, wazze, rám tört a keresztény kommandó alvezére (azért nem fővezért mondok, mert az Gubb lenne, ez meg csak az arab... :) – Alensha ^talk 01:43, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome back?

Well I'm trying to limit my addiction...--Steven Fruitsmaak (Reply) 17:25, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I'm not very succesful in limiting my activities on WikiNews either...--Steven Fruitsmaak (Reply) 10:13, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

slightly disturbing...

Jó napot kivánok, NCurse,

I was just wandering around the wiki and came across this: [1] which I must admit I find rather disturbing. It's easy to see that as almost a veiled threat; i.e. "slant the article to the interpretation I want, or some Hungarians are going to get hurt." I don't believe that P. is saying that he himself will hurt anyone, but I still find it troubling, especially the more I learn about recent events in Vojvodina. Is this something we should be concerned about, or am I just over-reacting again? K. Lásztocska 17:19, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Köszönöm. (Sajnos én nagyon rosszul beszelék magyarul, és nehéz megérteni nekem!) I think I understand--you think it isn't really a big problem, but we should take notice if the situation changes for the worse? K. Lásztocska 23:14, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No big problem, "Pusztalakó." :) (I've just noticed that's Alensha's nickname for you, it's pretty funny! Is there a similar word for someone from Miskolc?!) It gave me a chance to practice my translating! :) K. Lásztocska 15:45, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

LOL :) – Alensha ^talk 15:03, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not laughing... NCurs e _work 15:10, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, look on the bright side! I'm "Külföldi", at least you still live in Hungary... :) K. Lásztocska 18:46, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

még mindig nem nevetsz ?István 20:00, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Still can't... I'm going to take my pharmacology exam tomorrow morning. Hard work... NCurs e _work 20:56, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Good luck with that! :) K. Lásztocska 20:58, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

szurkoltam, pusztalakóm. sikerült? ne csigázz... – Alensha ^talk 17:47, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Köszönöm, nagyon jó lett, úgyhogy ezen is túl vagyok. :) The next step is cardiology on Monday... But now, I'm back in business. NCurs e _work 17:50, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ügyes vagy, gratula :) menni fog a kardiológia is, biztos vagyok benne :) – Alensha ^talk 20:28, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Supernova announcement

I saw your announcement on the collaboration on supernova at Wikipedia:WikiProject Physics. Could you also please post it at Wikipedia:WikiProject Astronomy and Wikipedia:WikiProject Astronomical objects? Thank you, Dr. Submillimeter 21:09, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for cross-posting the announcement. Dr. Submillimeter 09:03, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User:Fiastyuk

IGe benézett a Wikidézetekbe, dobd ki, kérlek. OsvátA 22:16, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

Medportal

Could you have a look at Portal:Medicine/Selected article candidates? I've asked User:Snowmanradio to join us on the portal, you seem also busy with your many other projects as well as I am.--Steven Fruitsmaak (Reply) 15:32, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, yes I was but I take frequent study breaks also... anyway I still have one week till my first exam. Hope yours are going according to plan? All the best!--Steven Fruitsmaak (Reply) 20:35, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Portál

Kedves NCurse!

Mint portálfelelőst az alábbira kérnélek meg: legyél szíves ezt a portáltervet szemrevételezni, technikailag mennyire megoldható a majdani beélesítése.

Köszönöm!

hu:User:DEgenerated —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 82.141.159.95 (talk) 18:33, 8 January 2007 (UTC).[reply]

WP:ADOPT

Hi there,

As a current Adopter with the Adopt-a-User program there has been some ongoing developments that we would like to bring to your attention.

A new Adopter's Area has been created where you can find useful resources and other Adopter's experiences. Please feel free to add any resources you may have found useful as an Adopter, as well as recount any experiences that you think may help others. If you know of any useful resources for new users / Adoptees then you can add them here.

Also the way the adoption process works has changed slightly. To decrease workload at Category:Wikipedians seeking to be adopted in Adopt-a-user, on offering adoption please change the {{Adoptme}} template to {{Adoptoffer}} on the user's user page, and this will add the user to Category:Wikipedians having been offered adoption. Users that have already been offered adoption can always have a second or third offer, but by separating out those users that have not had an adoption offer yet, it is hoped that no one will go lacking.

Furthermore numerous Adopters have been adding their details to a list of users available for adopting, to offer a more personalised service and allow new users to browse through and pick their own Adopter. The quickest way to adopt though, is still to contact users at the Category:Wikipedians seeking to be adopted in Adopt-a-user.

Finally - thanks for all your hard work, keep it up - and if you have any general questions or suggestions about the further development of Wikipedia:Adopt-a-User please bring them to our talk page. Cheers Lethaniol 13:57, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Work

Great! Hope the exams went well. I'm on service this week, but I'll find time to work on things. Why don't you start with a relevant lit search? -- Samir धर्म 00:30, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi NCurse, I ran a quick lit search today, and there's not much at all (6 papers, none of which is relevant). This is a good sign -- Samir धर्म 20:27, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why don't we make it medicine as a whole for now, and see if it's too large an area? -- Samir धर्म 21:29, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Take your time.... and good luck with the exams! -- Samir धर्म 12:34, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Natural science now the COTF

You showed support for Amazon rainforest at Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Core topics/Core topics COTF. This article was selected as our collaboration of the fortnight. Hope you can help.

Also, good luck with exams! Walkerma 03:13, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Whacking Promopeddler article

I noticed you CSD A7'd the article... was being on Inc.'s Top 500 not an assertion of notability (is Inc. Magazine just a stateside thing)? That's WP:CORP 2, plus I had included one WP:CORP 1 reference, with a talk page note on digging through the rest (WP:CORP allows any one criteria, but WP:CORP 1 requires multiple sources). Anyways, I'll look deeper into putting up a better article with more external sources in the next week or so, and (as the others have said), good luck on the exams! Ronabop 05:06, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikidézetek

Van egy kis takarítanivaló..., te meg sehol. OsvátA —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 80.98.106.180 (talk) 18:58, 18 January 2007 (UTC).[reply]

ezek a pusztaiak... rémes... – Alensha ^talk 01:06, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Érlelődik bennem a gondolat, hogy odahagyom a Wikidézeteket. Tökmagány. OsvátA

ne már. >:-(

most jövök a Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style (capital letters) oldalról, megmondtam a magamét. ez volt az a nagy háború, amit el akartam indítani és a segítségedet kérni, NCurse, de már elindították helyettem, úgy látszik, másokat is zavart :) ez a dolog tudott leginkább kiborítani az enwikiben. utálom a rossz helyesírást. :) – Alensha ^talk 01:54, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Jelentkeztem a Wikidézetekben adminnak. Váltottam skype-üzenetet erről grinnel. Nézz be, kérlek. Üdv, OsvátA.

Ezt: [2] nem értem. Mit nem tudok? OsvátA —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 80.98.106.180 (talk) 21:46, 6 March 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Could you please check something?

Hello NCurse, I hope you came through your exams with all your neurons intact. Let us know when its now "Dr. NCurse". Could I ask a favour - to check my account? I seem to have lost the ability to make reverts. Could you tell me if there is something wrong? Ive not broken 3RR, or any other policy (that I know of) and except for one contentious exchange (Vajdaság), things have been relatively peaceful. Sorry for the bother - I just want to make sure nothing stealthily untoward is going on in adminland. István 20:21, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

SCOTM

Thanks for the notification ^^ --Der yck C. 12:29, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Release version work

Hi, how did the exams go? Thanks for getting in touch - are you able to work on Version 0.7 now? There are lots of nominations to review, including loads of set nominations. I have been pretty tied up with Version 0.5 (now beta testing :)) and eyu100 has been very quiet too. Please try and help reduce the backlog! I'm working tonight on organising the 1.0 infrastructure - a lot of changes are happening and I'm hoping for/expecting an influx of new people once Version 0.5 comes out (later this month, I think). All the best, Walkerma 05:42, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

why delete the page chitrakot

could not understand why you deleted the page chitrakot? the photos were uploaded with such trouble on a slow server and was given copy left cant figure out how to do this sounds like a travelbook become a reason. then why did you not ask for the clean up of language? nothing in that page was taken from any site or so. if there is a way in which you can get it back please do it. the author and his friend used the took those photos and want them to be useful in wiki. this place is in one of the poorest regions in the world. called bastar in india. there are currently very few articles in wiki about the region, i was hoping to build upon from here. its so unfortunate that you decided to delete them

Author of the photograph has also given the photos in the following link http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/System_of_Rice_Intensification

Lem

hi, Puszta-dweller, thought I'd tell you if you haven't noticed already, the huwiki article about Lem, which was written by you, has only one day left on peer review, if you want to add any comments or think you can improve the article, please do so. it's pretty close to being featured article material. – Alensha ^talk 00:34, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Antioxidant FAC

Hi there. I wondered if you had time to review this article? The FAC nomination is here. Thank you. TimVickers 05:15, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I've responded to your suggestions. TimVickers 19:03, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

SCOTM notice

Thanks for your notification about the article Oxygen =] --Der yck C. 06:29, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Request

Dear NCurse,

I saw your comment in previous FAC article. I was wondering if you could provide me with some feedback for the Ohio Wesleyan University article, if you have the time? Thank you so much for your help and time! I greatly appreciate it! LaSaltarella 20:42, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GA request

Hi NCurse, I was wondering if you could spare a while to review the Vitamin C article. I feel it's worthy of GA status, but obviously you're the expert. I noticed you're interested in the field the article vaguely falls under, yet you haven't edited it. And in pre-emptive thanks, may I be the first to say Happy Birthday! :) — Jack · talk · 02:27, Wednesday, 7 March 2007

Thanks for looking it over! :P oh and the birthday thing ... I totally misinterpreted one of your userboxes, whoops! — Jack · talk · 04:57, Saturday, 10 March 2007

copyright law

Szia NCurse,

What do you know about Hungarian copyright law? There's another storm brewing on Commons about our 1956 pictures, and specifically the Stalin-boots one (my favorite!). If you can help out it would be greatly appreciated. :) Hope your studies are still going well! K. Lásztocska 16:51, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Szia!

Akarom mondani: Hi!! Be kellett jelentkeznem, mert olyan tartományból kapom az IP címeket (T-Online), amely a jelek szerint blokkolva van. Remélem, így már nem lesz gond az egyszer-egyszer megejtendő iw beírásokkal és a "cikklopásokkal". Ígérem, nem fogok rád szégyent hozni ;))! --Lily15 09:40, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Super League Dream Team

This is an officially sanctioned award, that was fully sourced, catergorised and explained. Can you please run through the reasons for deleting documentation of sporting awards. Many thanks for your attention to the matter? Londo06 13:57, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please reinstate this article. 194.75.128.200 17:00, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes it is specific to rugby league. It is not connected with associated football or linked to any other sport. There is evidence of the award on more websites beyond the BBC. As per previous offer by yourself, I can clean it up and source it more fully. Londo06 17:05, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Concerning your Admin Coaching assignments

Your name is still listed at Wikipedia:Admin coaching/Volunteers. The department is heavily backlogged with student's requests for coaches, and we need your help!

Note that the instructions may have changed since the last time you checked, and the department now follows a self-help process...

If you don't currently have a student, or if you believe you can handle another one, please select a student from the request list at Wikipedia:Admin coaching/Requests and contact them. See the instructions on Wikipedia:Admin coaching. Good luck.

If you are no longer available to coach, , please remove yourself from the volunteers list.

Thank you.

The Transhumanist 03:25, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AITO - why deleted?

Hi, I was just wondering why the entry for the Association of Independent Tour Operators (AITO) has been deleted. If you see Great Rail Journeys (one of their members - they mention they are a member of AITO) or "ABTA" - the Association of British Travel Agents which is a very similar body, they are all present on the site. Can you please explain why AITO is not able to be featured? thanks.

Your talk page

NCurse said: Thank you for that correction on my talk page! It's always great to feel that others watch your page to remove mistakes like that.

You're very welcome. I have a ton of links I look out for to revert, mostly from anonymous users, and sometimes they occur on user talk pages. Hopefully this doesn't happen very often where established members are concerned. Bobo . 20:02, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

NCurse said: Wow! A real soldier of Wikipedia. We can't appreciate enough editors like you. Keep it up!

It doesn't look to have happened since I last contacted you so I'm imagining that it shouldn't happen again. Normally the editors attack the user pages and are done with it but unfortunately you were stuck with the New messages bar instead. Not a problem. Bobo . 20:41, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder

Note here; hope all is well with you. Best, SandyGeorgia (Talk) 16:40, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

SVG images

Do you know of any other images that would benefit from being created as an SVG? I don't have the skill to do anatomical drawings but ones like the recessive gene one I can do. Also, ones like Image:Contiguous leads.svg are almost trivial. Cburnett 19:02, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Metabolism FAC

Hi there, sorry to bother you, but if you had any time I'd appreciate your input on this article. The nomination page is here. Thanks! TimVickers 27 March 2007 (UTC).

Hah! That's very kind, thanks. TimVickers 20:02, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Association of Independent Tour Operators

Hi, Many thanks for your time & message earlier regarding why the AITO article was deleted. I have spent some time working on it and have entered: AITO (The Association of Independent Tour Operators) is a trade organisation of over 150 independent and specialist Tour Operator companies. Each member of AITO must adhere to a strict code of conduct known as the Quality Charter. (Official Website)

{{Tourism-stub}} Category:Organisations based in England Category:Transport Associations

But this seems to be sent to deletion too. Please can you explain why? I am using the article on ABTA as an example and I can't see why the above can't be ok if the ABTA one is fine. I would be very grateful if you could have a look at the above and explain what I am doing wrong. Many thanks in advance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Beckycraig10 (talk • contribs)