User talk:NAZONAZO

The Wikipedian time was 03:42, Friday, 22 November, 2024 (UTC). Update it here!

Welcome!

Welcome!

Hello, NAZONAZO, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! Lradrama 18:18, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Sho Uchida

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Sho Uchida, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Sho Uchida seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Sho Uchida, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 18:10, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What do you think

Now we are talking in Talk:Empress Myeongseong#Requested move. You formerly wrote about this issue in Talk:Empress Myeongseong. Tell us your opinion.--Bukubku (talk) 09:27, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Translate all the primary sources

Since you're supporting Bukubku (talk · contribs)'s edits, you're also responsible for translating all the contents in English. I see that his edits on the article "WP:Original research and WP:SYNTHESIS to make a false point that the main charge for the assassination is not Japanese. Because he only selectively chose the primary sources to illustrate the incident. He also missed "the restoration of her class and name" after the plot of the cover up was discovered by eye-witnesses and foregin diplomats. Besides, the plug-in is only effective for Internet Explorer users, and not every one can understand the old Korean language mixed with old hangul and hanja. If you want to keep the content, translate the whole content into English. --Caspian blue 07:48, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Email

Perhaps you can send me an E-mail sometime and we can discuss articles - perhaps we have similar interests etc.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:EmailUser/Sennen_goroshi

カンチョーSennen Goroshi ! (talk) 23:13, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for messages. I reply to you.--NAZONAZO (talk) 23:49, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mindful of 3RR rule

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Empress Myeongseong. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. --Caspian blue 12:12, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

January 2009

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on So Far from the Bamboo Grove. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. --Caspian blue 21:31, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

nyt cite

Nazonnazo, the NYT article can't be used as a citation to support your use of "queen min" since the sentence you're trying support with the cite doesn't address that issue. The claim that's being made by the portion of the text is that there was international outrage over the assassination not that her title was "queen min". You need to address this edit issue of whether queen min is appropriate in the talk page or in a portion of text of the article that deals with this issue(obviously none exists). On top of that the NYT pdf doesn't even use the title "queen min".

Please read WP:CIT if you need more information on technical aspects of how to make citations.Melonbarmonster2 (talk) 22:00, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I replied to you on talk page.--NAZONAZO (talk) 06:08, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

RE:

The first is "championships", the second is worded similarly to "champion contest" or "champion competition". And sorry for the late reply; I was unable to reply ASAP. -- 李博杰 | —Talk contribs email guestbook complaints 09:40, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I replied to you on talk page. Thank you very much.--NAZONAZO (talk) 19:04, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

note

The first is "全国游泳锦标赛", and the second is "全国游泳冠军赛".--NAZONAZO (talk) 19:12, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

1RR warning on Liancourt Rocks

Please note that you are close to violating the 1RR rule noted at the top of the Talk:Liancourt Rocks page in the "Suggested Rules of Engagement" section (as per WP:ARBLIANCOURT). Please review that section, taking special note of the following paragraph:

No Edit Warring will be accepted under any circumstances and all editors are expected to observe a strict 1RR. This means that if another editor disagrees with your edit the edit may be reverted (see note above) and may not be reinserted unless there is a clear consensus to allow the edit.

Please note that any edit warring of any sort will not be tolerated and will result in a block. I appreciate your cooperation in this matter. ···日本穣^? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe 18:00, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:36, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]