Jump to content

User talk:N623

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

N623 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I Am Not Him

Decline reason:

You are clearly the same user who also operated the blocked accounts M623 and F623. You may not create new accounts to dodge a block on a prior account. Whether or not you are Randy Jayain, you are currently blocked under at least two other user names. Jayron32.talk.contribs 00:36, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Blocking admin contacted. Please await response. --Jayron32.talk.contribs 00:25, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
See User talk:M623 and User talk:F623. AniMatedraw 00:30, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

N623 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Per Wikipedia's Blocking policy it states that "Blocks are intended to reduce the likelihood of future problems, by either removing, or encouraging change in, a source of disruption. They are not intended for use in retaliation, as punishment, or where there is no current conduct issue which is of concern." Animate has only blocked me because of her suspisions and is retaliting and punishing me. Please help me by unblocking me

Decline reason:

One request at a time, please. And even if this were your only open request, I'd decline per WP:NOTTHEM. — Daniel Case (talk) 17:18, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

N623 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Further evidence. I did some researching on this "Randy" fellow and here is waht I came up with. He is phycotically obsessed with Carly. I have so far made few edits on the article: only adding images (liscencing is fixed by TAnthony) and updating the article (and editing headlines). Randy changes the names to Alcazar and Morgan and messes around. I devolloped the articles of Kristina, Michael, Morgan, Maxie, Jax (sometimes), Jason (sometimes), and Tracy. Although I made a mistake once, I made up for it. SPeaking about mistakes, 2 users vandalised Claudia Zacchara's article in which I fixed and warned those users. Randy moves the Claudia and Carly articles contantly to match their uncommon married names. Randy insults and threatens all of the users that go against him. Me, I only went to other users to ask help on how to deal with one person. Randy is also obsesed with Courtney Matthews (changing her name to Courtney Jacks) and also does many bizare things. I created this N623 account because the public comjputer I used had the M623 with the password and I lost it and my N623 was created after wards. Then when I used the public comp, it had the account registered so I used that. I havent been blocked before. Cant I get a warning or if possible, a temporary block. I swear i am not who you think I am. Not only that, I created the F623 because I had to ask Flyer 22 or TAnthony for help on unblocking me. Please re-consider, I have made great edits and fixed vandalised articles.

Decline reason:

This is too confused for me to understand.  Sandstein  17:35, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You are not allowed to remove declined templates, even if you don't like the answers. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 00:43, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

N623 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Further evidence. I did some researching on this "Randy" fellow and here is waht I came up with. He is phycotically obsessed with Carly. I have so far made few edits on the article: only adding images (liscencing is fixed by TAnthony) and updating the article (and editing headlines). Randy changes the names to Alcazar and Morgan and messes around. I devolloped the articles of Kristina, Michael, Morgan, Maxie, Jax (sometimes), Jason (sometimes), and Tracy. Although I made a mistake once, I made up for it. SPeaking about mistakes, 2 users vandalised Claudia Zacchara's article in which I fixed and warned those users. Randy moves the Claudia and Carly articles contantly to match their uncommon married names. Randy insults and threatens all of the users that go against him. Me, I only went to other users to ask help on how to deal with one person. Randy is also obsesed with Courtney Matthews (changing her name to Courtney Jacks) and also does many bizare things. I created this N623 account because the public comjputer I used had the M623 with the password and I lost it and my N623 was created after wards. Then when I used the public comp, it had the account registered so I used that. I havent been blocked before. Cant I get a warning or if possible, a temporary block. I swear i am not who you think I am. Not only that, I created the F623 because I had to ask Flyer 22 or TAnthony for help on unblocking me. Please re-consider, I have made great edits and fixed vandalised articles.

Decline reason:

Because you have vandalized, and deny it, and because you are avoiding your block by creating new accounts, and deny it, you are not going to find an administrator who will unblock you, no matter how many templates you use. Users who sockpuppet are the least likely to be unblocked- since sockpuppetry is inherently dishonest, and involves telling lots of lies, it's hard for other editors to believe anything that a sockpuppeteer says- that's why people who do it usually end up being blocked forever. You are only wasting your own time and ours. If a time ever comes when you seriously want to make useful edits, and make a decision to avoid the situations which caused the problems before, this is my advice: take some time away from Wikipedia- a week for each account you used is a good rule of thumb. While you're waiting, you might read your way through some of WP:HELP, but don't create any new accounts or edit at all. That'll show that you're respecting the block instead of trying to avoid it. When the time is over, go back to the very first account you created, and make an unblock request in which you apologize for what you did wrong- be specific and mean it. Be specific about how you'll edit differently in the future. You might be asked for a complete list of your accounts; be prepared to give it. I can't guarantee you'll get unblocked with that method, but it's the only thing I've ever seen work. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 00:41, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

{unblock|I am not denying I created 2 accounts (N623 and F623) but come on how am I Randy?}}

Since you are not denying that you have abused multiple accounts, there is no reason for continuing to call administrators to review this appropriate block. Your request has now been thorougly reviewed; I will help you to accept your block by disabling your ability to make further unblock requests. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 15:03, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]