User talk:N2xjk/Archive 1

Archive 1

About my railroad article...

I have listed the Ulster and Delaware Railroad article as a featured article candidate. Review the article, and express your thoughts about it here. Good luck! --Kschwerdt514 05:46, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

Calling programmers

We need coders for the WikiProject Disambigation fixer. We need to make a program to make faster and easier the fixing of links. We will be happy if you could check the project. You can Help! --Neo139 09:09, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

WikiProject Amateur radio

Hello. I see that you have listed yourself as a licensed Amateur radio operator. Please consider taking a look at a proposal to setup a WikiProject Amatateur radio. Thank you. --StuffOfInterest 18:44, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

Thacher Park

Thanks for the correction on the above.... still getting used to US systems of designation, slightly different to back in the UK. Now living over here near Albany in Upstate NY....FYI I am also a Radio Ham G6HDD (class A all bands), waiting to see if the ARRL will accept my licence and give me the reciprocal 'W' call. Regards Phil Geotek 00:25, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:Allischalmerslogo.gif

Image Copyright problem

This is an automated message from a robot. You have recently uploaded Image:Allischalmerslogo.gif. The file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 16:07, 7 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. If you believe you received this message in error, please notify the bot's owner. OsamaKBOT 16:07, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Durbin and Greenbrier Valley Railroad

A tag has been placed on Durbin and Greenbrier Valley Railroad, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD a7.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. Darksun 15:13, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:McCormickTractorsLogo.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:McCormickTractorsLogo.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:15, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

Citing sources

Could you please cite sources for information you add, e.g. your recent addition to GE Evolution Series. See our sourcing policy for more details, and if you need any help let me know. Matthew Brown (Morven) (T:C) 05:50, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Landini80x80.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Landini80x80.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 00:08, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

Image:SP 6051.JPG

I really like Image:SP 6051.JPG. I was wondering what camera was used and what the settings were. Cheers, Kingturtle (talk) 18:05, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

Olympus Camedia C-720, full auto mode. n2xjk (talk) 21:29, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

John Deere related articles

Hello N2xjk, note you had left comment on the List of models article. I'd put some comments on as well, then came back to it and started to sort it (attempt). Now having looked at it in more depth it has numerous problem's IMO. Looking for comment as to format to follow as Articles titles "List" yet its more lumps of randomly pasted (copied) material. First bits on closer inspection are all garbled, so have started a re write of the Waterloo boy section of line. BulldozerD11 (talk) 02:23, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

Southern Pacific 6051 photo needs a discriptive name

N2xjk, I was trying to categorize your photo of Southern Pacific 6051 but its been blacklisted because of the non-discriptive file name. could you please rename it to Southern Pacific 6051.jpg and add it to the Southern Pacific locomotives category?. Thanks Tons!

PS, this has happened to several of my own photos as well..

Grey3k (talk) 17:23, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

Your File:Heber UP618.JPG is on today's Main Page!

Dear N2xjk, In case you missed it, your image contrib, File:Heber UP618.JPG, is on Wikipedia's Main Page this morning as a Did You Know? item for Outlaw Trail: The Treasure of Butch Cassidy. Cheers,  JGHowes  ^talk 13:21, 29 May 2009 (UTC)

Thanks. By the time I looked for it it had already spilled over to the archive list. n2xjk (talk) 05:07, 30 May 2009 (UTC)

NowCommons: File:Heber UP618.JPG

File:Heber UP618.JPG is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Heber UP618.JPG. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:Heber UP618.JPG]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 19:35, 30 May 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Strokers Dallas

An article that you have been involved in editing, Strokers Dallas, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Strokers Dallas. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Dbratland (talk) 20:29, 16 July 2009 (UTC)

Your edit to World's largest locomotive

That was useful, thanks! --Old Moonraker (talk) 15:06, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Rick Fairless

A tag has been placed on Rick Fairless requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Triwbe (talk) 15:18, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

Please stop using WP for advertising.

Please stop trying to use Wikipedia to advertise for Strokers Bar and Grill. The notability of this business was debated, and you had your chance to influence the outcome. The page was deleted, though you went and re-created it as a redirect anyway. That's fine, but there is a limit.

You should now accept that this business does not meed notability guidelines and stop trying to work around that.

Please also read Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. Editing Wikipedia to promote your own interests is strongly discouraged, and if you have a conflict of interest, you should declare it on your user page.--Dbratland (talk) 18:31, 14 August 2009 (UTC)

For the record I have no relationship to Rick Fairless or Strokers Dallas, other than seeing him on Biker's Build Off, and visiting the location a grand total of two times in the past 6 years. I'll admit my interest in choppers is but from an armchair, but I don't see how you can completely distance Rick Fairless from his businesses. By your logic, Billy Lane's article shouldn't mention and link to Choppers Inc, and Jerry Covington's article shouldn't mention or link to Covington's Cycle City. n2xjk (talk) 20:42, 14 August 2009 (UTC)

There's no harm in mentioning that he has a business. What you are doing is blatantly trying to get customers to visit his restaurant and associated enterprises. Ask yourself: What need is there put the street address in an encyclopedia? It's in Dallas is all readers need to know. If someone is planning a trip there and decides to visit, they will look it up on Google. There is absolutely no chance whatsoever that deleting the street address from Wikipedia -- or even the name of the business -- is going to prevent someone from going there if they desire it. In fact, if the address changes, I guarantee you the new address will show up in Google long before it in Wikipedia. So what's the point?

What you can do is expand the article with information about what made Rick Fairless famous. Why exactly do his bikes get attention that a million other bikes don't get? What, specifically, did he invent or innovate? What or who, specifically, has he influenced? There is a chapter in a book about him and I think the answers are found there, as well as in other sources -- reliable, independent ones, not press releases. You've devoted so much effort to drawing attention to the fact that he is famous, and trying to find media hype to go with it, when you should be writing encyclopedia content about Fairless' works and deeds. If readers were given the chance to learn about that stuff, they will find their way to his bar and grill all on their own.--Dbratland (talk) 20:57, 14 August 2009 (UTC)

Archive 1