User talk:N0MINAY
April 2017
[edit]Hello, I'm Sundayclose. I noticed that you made a comment on the page Talk:Lee Harvey Oswald that didn't seem very civil, so it has been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Sundayclose (talk) 02:38, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
Please remember to assume good faith when dealing with other editors, which you did not do on User talk:Sundayclose. Thank you. EvergreenFir (talk) 06:47, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
Why should I assume good faith?
- Because assuming good faith is a behavioral guideline that all editors who want to contribute to to Wikipedia are expected to follow. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 07:27, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Well, based on my experience with you, I'm not assuming good faith.
- I am giving you accurate information, in response to your questions. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 07:43, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Lee Harvey Oswald's guilt in Kennedy's assassination has been disproven thoroughly through research. The US government has a long history of lying about all controversial things, and you're just stenographying their propagana, not objectively questioning. N0MINAY (talk) 20:23, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
ANI
[edit]There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. JoJo Anthrax (talk) 12:55, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
Indefinite block
[edit]{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. El_C 13:00, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
- Fuck you, you CIA pig. Wikipedia is not even a legitimate site for anything controversial. N0MINAY (talk) 05:29, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
- The Dunning–Kruger effect is not your friend, N0MINAY. And sending me emails that read (in full) "fuck you," reflects poorly on you beyond just your diminished critical faculties. Oh well. El_C 11:51, 24 August 2021 (UTC)