User talk:N.edits335

This is N.edits335's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Benazir Bhutto Bridge has been accepted

Benazir Bhutto Bridge, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Qcne (talk) 16:42, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please add some WP:CATEGORIES to the article. Qcne (talk) 16:43, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Qcne Can i create an article now without posting it for a review N.edits335 (talk) 16:47, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @N.edits335. Yes, you may create articles directly now without going via draft.

However, all new articles are patrolled as part of the New Pages Patrol, and if these patrollers feel new articles you have created do not pass quality standards they may delete or convert them to a draft. If you would like to continue to use the Articles for Creation process instead then you may.

I would note to be careful on your grammar: I had to tidy up some of your wording on the draft to conform to our grammar standards. Qcne (talk) 16:54, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Qcne it means my articles wouldn't be reviewed. N.edits335 (talk) 16:57, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No, they would will still get reviewed by the New Pages Patroller but would exist as an article instead of a draft. Qcne (talk) 16:57, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Zulqarnain Sikandar (November 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Cocobb8 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Zulqarnain Sikandar and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Cocobb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs) 19:21, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, N.edits335! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Cocobb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs) 19:21, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Zulqarnain Sikandar (November 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Zulqarnain Sikandar and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Qcne (talk) 19:42, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Qcne There is no reason to decline the article.The article is properly referenced and in detail.All reference show subject that is provided in the article. N.edits335 (talk) 19:46, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @N.edits335. I felt it didn't quite meet WP:NENTERTAINER. If you disagree with my judgement (and I feel no ill-will if you do), feel free to re-submit it again and I will leave a comment on the page explaining this. Qcne (talk) 19:48, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Qcne ok N.edits335 (talk) 19:49, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Qcne The person is famous YouTube personality and actor.The details are provided. N.edits335 (talk) 19:51, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Famous is not the same as our special definition of "Notability". Please see WP:NENTERTAINER for our notability definition and requirements. Qcne (talk) 19:53, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Namak Haram (TV series) (November 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Kilaseell was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

No reliable independent sources about the series itslef. Only about the actors/actresses. – Kilaseell - Message me! - 22:43, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Namak Haram (TV series) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

– Kilaseell - Message me! - 22:43, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Kilaseell But the Reference is provided from the original network where the series is aired and also from News Channels. N.edits335 (talk) 06:20, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. That is not an independent source.

The other sources are about just the cast members, which do not make the series notable. – Kilaseell - Message me! - 06:33, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Kilaseell Ok i will fix my errors on reference and wil resubmit it. N.edits335 (talk) 06:36, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rah-e-Junoon (November 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rah-e-Junoon and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 09:44, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Zulqarnain Sikandar (November 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ca was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This looks very spammy and unreliable. Please remove it. Other than that, the listed sources just talk about Sikandar's marriage and bebut on a drama show. I don't think there is enough information available to justify an entire article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Zulqarnain Sikandar and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ca ^{talk to me!} 13:23, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Namak Haram (TV series) (November 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ca was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The current listed sources only talk about the release of the film and give only basic of basic details about it. (like actors,publishers, etc) Try finding reviews by reputable publishers/reviewers. Good luck!

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Namak Haram (TV series) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ca ^{talk to me!} 13:50, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Nauman335 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Nauman335. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 14:55, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Bbb23

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

N.edits335 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was the new editor to Wikipedia English and i was not properly read the Wikipedia Editing Policies.I want to say that I will not make like this fool edits and not contribute without proper knowledge.Please unblock me.I request you to unblock from Wikipedia.Thank You

Decline reason:

This does not mention the reason for your block at all. If you are trying to admit you are indeed the same person behind both accounts, you'll need to log in to your original account and make your request there, properly addressing your violations of WP:SOCK in addition to the problems that lead to your original block. Yamla (talk) 15:47, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.