User talk:Mythologia

Welcome!

Hello, Mythologia, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! TomStar81 04:50, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Japan

Please do not delete content in Japan without discussing it in Talk:Japan. Blanket deletion of content without justification is considered vandalism. Thank you.--Sir Edgar 04:47, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It is your problem >Sir Edgar. I recommend you to hold the rule which you write.Mythologia 03:55, 29 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Civility and Etiquette

Kindly avoid throwing insults or accusations at other Wikipedians who are trying to help. Please see Wikipedia:Civility and Wikipedia:Etiquette. Thank you.--Sir Edgar 06:48, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I support Kamosuke edits. Your last talk edit is 02:20, 22 June 2006 Sir Edgar. "Please do not delete content in Japan without discussing it in Talk:Japan. Blanket deletion of content without justification is considered vandalism. Thank you.". Or as you wrote below.Mythologia 07:12, 26 June 2006 (UTC).[reply]

Do not repeat messages you post here on my Talk page. That is not necessary.--Sir Edgar 07:59, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It is your problem >Sir Edgar. I recommend you to hold the rule which you write.Mythologia 02:13, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Civility and Etiquette

Kindly avoid throwing insults or accusations at other Wikipedians who are trying to help. Please see Wikipedia:Civility and Wikipedia:Etiquette.--Mythologia 07:12, 26 June 2006 (UTC).[reply]

This is for you.>Sir Edgar. Please do not alter the text. Mythologia 08:08, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You sound like a parrot.--Sir Edgar 22:48, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

See yourself. I recommend you to hold the rule which you write. Mythologia 01:56, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please be kind

Please read Wikipedia:Civility and Wikipedia:Etiquette.

I don't think you are being kind and polite in the Wikipedia discussions. I'm not saying I'm perfect, but we need to try and create a more civil atmosphere in the talk pages. Even if you are not being rude, I don't think you are being nice either. Please be more polite. This is Wikipedia, not a war. Thanks Good friend100 15:37, 2 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi >friend100 I don't think you are being kind and polite in the Wikipedia discussions, too. But I think it is no problem. To make clear explation is need when we discuss about the fact. Let's talk clear about the fact. By the way your talk page isn't broken? Take care of it. Mythologia 16:07, 2 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Kindness and politeness should be addressed to everyone. You are right about facts. The problem is, facts are disputed between parties.

I don't understand what you mean by "broken".

The relations are strained between the two parties concerning Korea-Japan disputes. Its not going to be easy compromising but I'm still hopeful. Good friend100 02:14, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm hopeful too. >Good friend100. This type of relation is common in the world. But Let me make a point. I think that who is confident in himself behaves modestly. I hope you will be like so. Mythologia 09:05, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. Feeling inferior to others makes one to behave badly.

But being confident in yourself or what you represent makes you (i.e your home country) want to protect yourself and your representation. That causes you to fight for yourself or your representation, especially when the opposite side plays nasty or uses inappropiate words. Good friend100 22:49, 23 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't hope you not to fight, but to fight with modesty. I hope myself to do so, otherwise we can't confirm who or what are real opponents.Mythologia 00:18, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The fighting at the Dokdo talk page is too politically based. The opponents are clear. Its just that modesty cannot always represent what you wish to message to others. Good friend100 01:50, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think so. I think that you will know it sooner or later. Mythologia 02:19, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Gratitude

I hereby award this **Working Man's Barnstar** to **Mythologia** for tireless and endless work on fixing Japan-related articles--Questionfromjapan 11:34, 9 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your honorable mention. I will take it a step at a time. Mythologia 12:21, 9 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

3RR Warning

You have been warned about Wikipedia:Three-revert rule. Please discuss before undoing other editors' contributions and prior compromises. Dollarfifty 00:37, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Which edit was I warned of ? Mythologia 01:00, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please read the cited references

On your multiple reverts for the Japan article, it appears as if you are not reading the cited references. Although, one source did state Korean Peninsula, all the other sources stated Korea. In addition, all the sources stated Korea as being the main source of technology and some of the sources stated to a lesser extent China as a source. The DNA information is only relevent for rice cultivation which is thought to be from Southeast Asia (which included what is now South China). Also please use English references for the English version of wikipedia. Thanks. --Tyler 13:23, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please read discussion of the article. All of your questions have been answered clearly. Mythologia 13:56, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It is not acceptable to delete content from Wikipedia simply because you disagree it. If you continue to blank content for no good reason (like you did to Kimi ga Yo), you will end up being blocked. Instead of wasting your time and everyone else's, why don't you find something more constructive to do instead? -- Sakurambo 桜ん坊 20:01, 30 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't delete it because I am disagree it, but because it was not the truth. I don't oppose to write the content if it was truth. But to tell the truth I don't know any type of parody of Kimi ga Yo whereas I know the song is contestable. If you want to write the content, you mustn't misrepresent the facts of the content.Mythologia 21:53, 30 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not the truth? This story was reported by the Sankei Shimbun, the Guardian, the Korea Times, Independent Online, Reuters and other news organizations. Are you suggesting they all made this story up? Do you really think anyone is going to believe you? -- Sakurambo 桜ん坊 23:43, 30 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It was overbroad of incidence that the parodies have spread. See discussion of the article. Mythologia 23:53, 30 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

This account may need to be blocked due to abusive use of multiple accounts.

(Account information: block log · CentralAuth · suspected sockpuppets · confirmed sockpuppets)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mythologia (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

None given

Decline reason:

Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Kamosuke establishes that sockpuppets were being used. These sockpuppets were being used to abuse Wikipedia rules and guidelines. Therefore block is justified. ➨ ЯEDVERS 18:18, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

>Nihonje I have written what I want to say about being suspected as sock[1].

Using Same computer? Please retest IP's of Shougiku Win and me. I have never used my computer with others. I'm contracting with huge Internet provider and it assignes IP addresses dynamically. It will be easy to know that I am assigned IP addresses dynamically if you check my IP's. So if using same provider, it very occasionally occers that different people use same IP's in diffrent time. But it never occers different people use same IP in the same time because it assignes IP address individually. Mythologia 05:45, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

I have read some of Shougiku Win's edits, in fact I had not read his edits yet. And I think he and me are very different in style. I don't have a faculty to use 2 type of writing styles. Mythologia 07:33, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

I want to retest of IP's. But I know it is not your task >Nihonje. If you can requset it please write here. Or I will request it to administrators. Mythologia 16:12, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The request of unblock was disclaimed, but I am not the Shougiku Win. So I want to know why this matter was occured. Mythologia 05:11, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Would you tell me which kind of connection you are using. Are you using constant connection type, such as ADSL or optical fiber? If so, do you have the log of IP address for, let's say 2 weeks? I am viewing edits of you and Shogiku Wine and seeing several alternate edits as follows:

7/29 Mythologia→Shougiku Wine→Mythologia
7/28 Mythologia→Shougiku Wine→Mythologia
7/27 Mythologia (01:08)→Shougiku Wine (15:43-17:01)→Mythologia (22:51)
7/26 Shougiku Wine (19:20)→Mythologia (20:55)→Shougiku Wine (21:21)→Mythologia (21:38)
7/25 Mythologia (12:37)→Shougiku Wine (13:14)→Mythologia (14:37)→Shougiku Wine (14:38)→Mythologia (14:48)→Shougiku Wine (14:53)→Mythologia (14:58)
7/24 Shougiku Wine (00:15)→Mythologia (00:18-02:19)→Shougiku Wine (04:20)
7/23 Mythologia (01:11)→Shougiku Wine (03:26)→Mythologia (08:36)→Shougiku Wine (17:16)→Mythologia (19:27)→Shougiku Wine (19:37)
7/22 Mythologia (22:12)→Shougiku Wine (22:36)→Mythologia (23:42)

I am interested in whether your host address were fixed or changed in the periods and CU results showed both users were using the same address, especially on 7/25.--Jjok 17:43, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm contracting with huge Internet provider and it assignes IP addresses dynamically. I've already written it two times. Your lists are only indicative that he and I edited just around the same time. And the pages which were edited he and me differed. I think in those cases useing sockpuppet were no point. Thereto I am not Shougiku Wine, so I have to assert it to protect his right,too. I am surveying this matter now. Thank you for your lists.Mythologia 01:19, 4 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I thought if both of you were editing the same time, each of the host address would be maintained in a short time and they could not be the same, thus, at least you both were not using the same host (it nearly diminishes that you were reconnecting at the time though not enough to diminish the possibility of sock). The reason I also asked your plan was that many provider add such plan and address information on your host names, therefore, both of your host names can be quite different even your IP addresses were close.

I also knew that neither of you will sacrifice the other for your own account. I just thought that your provider could send a certification letter to wp admins that the edits by Shougiku Wine was done by a different user from you.

Since the edits of Shougiku Wine were not benefiting the others at all, I also wonder that what kind of abusive sock usage he/she can be for the others. --Jjok 08:24, 5 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think so too. But my protest was rejected. I am thinking what can I do next. Thank you for your comments. They are informative for me. Mythologia 14:17, 5 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Which do you want to keep?

Please indicate which of your two accounts you'd like to keep (Mythologia or Shougiku Wine) and I'll unblock the one you wish to keep. Thanks! ···日本穣^{? · Talk to Nihonjoe} 22:05, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

>日本穣 I am not the Shougiku Wine. So I'm main. But I think that he also will be main. So I think the CU will be needed for his credit and mine. But I know it is not your task,I will ask to retest of checkuser to administration. thanks Mythologia 00:29, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

>日本穣 (and administrators ) I wonder why I was baned because I isn't Shougiku Wine. It will be clear to check the IP's minutely. And I want to say that I didn't have reason to use a sockpuppet, because Shougiku Wine and me have differnt opinion about the article of Kimi ga Yo. Please see the note of the artcle again,Talk:Kimi_ga_Yo which was probably read by administrator. Mythologia 07:55, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

日本語で御免

ちょっちめいるおかいつうさせたんでめいるでいいんでしようしているぷろばいだかあいぴいがどうてきかせいてきかどうかおしえてくんない？こじんじょうほうわまもるから--Forestfarmer 14:23, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm contracting with huge Internet provider and it assignes IP addresses dynamically. I've already written it above. I don't know what's going on???Mythologia 14:34, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Japan

Mythologia , user:220.212.100.227 made a major rewrite of Japan. I thought I should mention this and that I reverted because it was already a FA. Cheers, :) Dlohcierekim 17:07, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I am stopped editing now, so I reserve my comment of it. But,thank you for your comment here. >Dlohcierekim :) Mythologia 01:10, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]