Jump to content

User talk:Mystar1959

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hey, is there any particular reason you keep vandalizing the content of Terry Goodkind? I mean, are you disputing the factuality or relevance of the material you're removing or do you just want to censor anything that might make your favorite author look bad? Seriously, if you have anything like a justification, please share it. Otherwise, I will revert each and every attempt you make, secure that reverting vandalism is not subject to WP:3RR. (However, your counter-reverts have no such protection, so you can get banned for them.) Alienus 02:42, 5 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

While you may think you have a "factual" basis, you do not; you simply have taken what you want from an interview to make Goodkind look bad. Only for your personal gain. You have no factual basis for stating such a topic. Nothing more than maligning someone.
ANd yes I have indeed disputed the factuality of your claim. WHile I may not be as well versed in this format, I have taken the nessary actions to have the information verfied. I have also given links to the administration of your other websites where you and your fellow plot to this very event. (unsigned by Mystar1959)

Go to the Discussion page and voice your grievances there. If you can get consensus support for your change, then I will no longer revert it. Good luck. Alienus 03:08, 5 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

perhaps a way to quickly head this off would be to arrange an official denial on TG's website (maybe not linked to internally) that you can point us to that can be referenced in a rationale on the TG discussion page here and used to "authorize" a cesation of this line of editing. Not sure if others will agree but this might work. :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page)/(Desk) 07:23, 5 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If Goodkind put something up on his web site that addresses this issue, it would certainly be worth reporting. It doesn't mean we'd remove what's in the article now, but we'd certainly give Goodkind equal time. Whatever we may think of him, he deserves a chance to respond to any accusations made. Alienus 19:42, 5 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

How did you find me???

[edit]

Ummm, Who is Terry Goodkind??? and how did my name get linked to him??? Any way, if you need me to I am glad to read over your(the), problem... But can you make your argument consise... As it is on my talk page it covers over 40 lines (on a widescreen computer) and the argument is not exactly clear... can you restate it in 15 lines or less??? Plus, can you tell me what the "opposition" wants, or believes to be true... WITHOUT bashing, or downplaying what the "opposition" is saying.

Thanks Eagle (talk) (desk) 19:36, 5 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Signing your talkpage edit

[edit]

Please sign all talkpage edits by adding four tildes ~~~~ at the end of your text. This automatically adds your username and the time and date. I note you signed as Mysar1959 on Talk:Terry Goodkind, which led one user to create a page in error in order to remove red links. Green Giant 03:35, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings. I've reverted your edit to Terry Goodkind, as private correspondence is not appropriate content for this article; please keep article content to published sources only. Thanks, Mindspillage (spill yours?) 02:28, 19 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Also, please do not republish personal correspondence without gaining the consent of the sender first. Your correspondent acted in good faith to assist you; please do not repay his efforts by doing this without his consent. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 02:31, 19 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your most recent comments crossed the line into incivility. Please curb your anger. Alienus 03:58, 19 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]