User talk:Myrmusp

March 2015

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to List of University of Westminster alumni‎, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Epeefleche (talk) 06:41, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at List of University of Westminster alumni, you may be blocked from editing. We do not need official confirmation; we have RS reporting. Epeefleche (talk) 21:26, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

List of University of Westminster alumni‎

I'm not keen on this man being on the list of alumni either but we must accept for now that he is this character 'Jihadi John' and that he is notable for the actions he is reported in every press outlet in the land to have carried out. If facts later dispute his identity the content can be changed. I must ask you not to change this again without discussion on the article's talk page. Poltair (talk) 16:37, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Agree with Poltair. As I've said to you in the past, more than once: "We do not need official confirmation; we have RS reporting." --Epeefleche (talk) 18:53, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you.

March 2015

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at List of University of Westminster alumni. We do not need official confirmation; we have RS reporting. Epeefleche (talk) 18:53, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

To avoid a block, you should consider responding at WP:AN3 and agree to wait for consensus. There is an abundance of published sources that this man attended the University of Westminster. EdJohnston (talk) 22:44, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring, as you did at List of University of Westminster alumni. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Swarm... ^—X— 02:47, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

June 2015

This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. You've already been blocked for this. Please stop. Please understand it is a final warning. This is RS-supported. Your edit is a continuation of your long-standing edit war. Epeefleche (talk) 08:48, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User:Myrmusp, if you continue with edits like this one that avoid describing Mohammed Emwazi as a terrorist you are risking a new block. The article talk page is open to you. EdJohnston (talk) 12:31, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

List of University of Westminster alumni

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Poltair (talk) 13:01, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

June 2015

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 18:20, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Any admin is free to modify as they see fit without my permission. The nature of the editor makes me think they have no interest in improving Wikipedia, or are a band hand sock account. Regardless, edit warring is edit warring, and while 3RR is a bright line, all edit warring is against policy, regardless of the pace. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 18:26, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]