User talk:Myrdred

Welcome!

Hello Myrdred, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! RJFJR 19:51, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Myth Units Section Poll

Hello! I noticed that you have contributed to discussion on the talk page for Myth (computer game). A poll for paring down the Units section has started, and I thought you might want to vote. Please accept my apologies if this does not interest you. Thank you! Argyrios 15:52, 20 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Doh!

Thanks for fixing my bum edit to Myth (computer game). Putting May instead of March was akin to putting 2008 as the date on my checks ;) --Dachannien^Talk_Contrib 16:48, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Worse Than Failure

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Worse Than Failure, by SuperDT, another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Worse Than Failure is an article about a certain website, blog, forum, or other web content that does not assert the importance or significance of that web location. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 7 under Articles, as well as notability guidelines for websites. Please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources which verify their content.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Worse Than Failure, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Worse Than Failure itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 05:59, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bit saddened that this page was deleted, contact me and I probably wouldn't mind helping hunting up sources for it. Mathmo ^Talk 22:21, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Necromium

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Necromium, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Gazimoff (talk) 09:22, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Necromium

An article that you have been involved in editing, Necromium, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Necromium. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Gazimoff (talk) 10:48, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Moving pages

Hi Myrdred,

The best way to move articles is to use the Move link on the left-hand side of the page. Cutting and pasting the text of articles from one to another only moves the text; it does not move the edit history. Fragmenting the edit history is both a nuisance and a legal issue, because when we don't provide a list of all contributors to an article, we are violating the GNU Free Documentation License. For this reason, you should always use the built-in move feature. If the location you wish to move to already exists, you will have to convince an administrator to do the move.

Because only administrators can undo a page move, please always make sure that other editors agree to your move before carrying it out.

Thanks for your contributions. Karl Dickman ^talk 00:30, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Pax Imperia Eminent Domain 000.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Pax Imperia Eminent Domain 000.png. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 08:30, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Copper (MUD)

The article Copper (MUD) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced, nothing worthwhile in Google Books search

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. czar 03:11, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of WebSitePro

The article WebSitePro has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (software) requirement. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 09:10, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]