User talk:Mynameisishaan

Nomination of Makoons Play School for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Makoons Play School is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Makoons Play School until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Noneate (talk) 15:23, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mynameisishaan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm reaching out to strongly contest the recent indefinite block on my account, "mynameisishaan". It is disheartening to witness such action, especially when based on an unfounded assumption of my association with AmanSharma111.

Key points I would like to emphasize:

1. No Association with AmanSharma111: At the outset, I unequivocally state that I have ZERO connection or affiliation with AmanSharma111. I operate as an independent contributor, solely with the intention of enhancing Wikipedia's content.

2. Adherence to Wikipedia's Guidelines: Each and every edit I've made has been carried out with meticulous respect for Wikipedia's guidelines. I have always ensured that the content I add is factual, unbiased, and verifiable.

3. Previous Clean Chit: This isn't the first time I've been wrongly associated with AmanSharma111. I was given a clean chit in the past, affirming my non-involvement. It's distressing to see history repeating itself, putting my credibility in question without concrete evidence.

4. Constructive Contributions: A detailed review of my edits will reveal a consistent pattern of constructive contributions. I have always aimed to bridge content gaps, fix inaccuracies, and enhance the overall quality of articles.

5. Transparent Discussions: Whenever there has been a contention or disagreement about any of my edits, I have actively engaged in the talk pages, justifying my edits and incorporating feedback when necessary.

6. Unbiased Editing: My contributions have never displayed any inclination or bias towards any specific topic or user, including AmanSharma111.

I understand the necessity to maintain the quality and credibility of Wikipedia, but I firmly believe that my indefinite block is a case of mistaken identity or unnecessary targeting. I implore the team to reconsider this decision, review my contributions, and reinstate my account.

I await a fair assessment and hope to resume my contributions to Wikipedia soon.

Warm regards mynameisishaan

Mynameisishaan (talk) 21:31, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This could be meat puppetry, but you describe things that have not happened with this account. The only talk page you posted to was to contest the speedy deletion of the article you wrote. I had to look up what "clean chit" meant, and I don't see one here or a prior block or accusation on this account. Something's going on here, probably UPE. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 22:16, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mynameisishaan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi The "Clean chit" can be found on Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Amansharma111/Archive and you can search for the date 22 September 2023, where I have been mentioned by the same person who thinks i am a socket. I have been given the clean chit by Reaper Eternal. Also, you can check my edits on the speedy deletion pages as well, I had used the talk page to discuss and contest and put up my point of views of how i feel the business is notable but after that, I was blocked and there was no response to that and the page was certainly deleted.

Decline reason:

Soft closing as stale. You may make a fresh, hopefully more persuasive, request. 331dot (talk) 09:08, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.