User talk:Myacc748239

Welcome!

Hi Myacc748239! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing!

TFD (talk) 02:15, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:Subject pronoun, you may be blocked from editing. We are not idiots. We recognise trolling when we see it. Pack it in now or you are very likely to be blocked. DanielRigal (talk) 00:30, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on others again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. DanielRigal (talk) 00:31, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@DanielRigal Which part is disrupting? Quote here. Myacc748239 (talk) 00:32, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

We are not idiots. We have seen trolling before. You are only here to stir up trouble. Pretty much everything you are doing here is knowingly and intentionally disruptive. You are on final warning now. Edit constructively or get blocked. --DanielRigal (talk) 00:35, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nah, quote what I'm asking. Myacc748239 (talk) 00:36, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No! We are not here to play stupid games with you. Stop now! This is an encyclopaedia not a playground. --DanielRigal (talk) 00:37, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Again, I'm not proven wrong, but end up being threatened to be blocked. Myacc748239 (talk) 00:38, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you block me because I'm exposing biases and asking simple thing, it shows an authoritarian block. Myacc748239 (talk) 00:37, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 00:46, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@GorillaWarfare, I'm just asking why Wikipedia didn't use the word "Allah" as the translation of Allah in Shahadah written in Taliban motto. I was asking why they act biased on it, I stated that Wikipedia has many biased users. Then a user alleged me of making disruptive edits. I asked him to quote which of my edits is disruptive, then I threatened to be blocked and I'm really blocked. It all started from I that want to edit the translation of Taliban motto, I have no intention to make bad edit, and here we are. Myacc748239 (talk) 00:55, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

And after that complains, I also complains the bias edits on pages about right and left politics. I forget to mention that. Myacc748239 (talk) 00:57, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

But, you alleged me by saying that I am:

"not here to build an encyclopedia",

just made me sad. It's unfounded claim. Myacc748239 (talk) 00:59, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Various people have helpfully explained policy to you, and warned you multiple times to stop with your disruptive behavior. You've made it abundantly clear that you're more interested in disrupting the project than improving it, so I've blocked you. We do not have infinite patience for trolling. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 00:59, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No, really, I'm just dissapointed. That's why I make a lot of edits consisting of the same complain. But, not my intention to be "not here to build an encyclopedia". It's not. Myacc748239 (talk) 01:01, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not even trolling. Okay, can you make a propose to change the meaning of Allah as "Allah in any text mentioning the translation of Shahada? Myacc748239 (talk) 01:02, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Explaining what happened

English wikipedia has some biased users. Once I was asking politely in someone's user talk page. But, they deleted my text here, here, and here because they can't prove me wrong. And threaten to block me even after I asked which of my edits were disruptive as they alleged. Myacc748239 (talk) 01:03, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What part of Wow you show your bias. You didn't prove me wrong and end up forcing to close the fact because having no strong argument. is polite? They deleted your posts on their own talk page because you were pestering them. Hounding editors until they accept your arguments or whatever you're expecting to happen does not equal to "exposing biases" or "not proving you wrong". That's a big fallacy.

You've not exactly built a strong case by accussing everyone else of being biased for not agreeing to your own terms. WP:NPOV means neutral editing, not neutral content. Please see the essay on WP:NEUTRALEDITOR. Furthermore, everyone here is biased, because there is no such thing as lack of personal bias (neither centrism nor apoliticism is unbiased). If you're able to abide by the rules of WP:CIVILITY towards other editors on this site you may hold any kind of bias you want and engage in improving articles in good faith. –Vipz (talk) 16:30, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]