User talk:My name is the master of all of the 6's

This user, My name is the master of all of the 6's, is taking a break from wikipedia from one full year and will be back in 2019 May 14 Thrusday 3:00 PM.

See below for more information.

I removed the March 2009 warning section. Those can be seen here.

April 2009

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Abce2 (talk) 18:34, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well listen, I never made a personal attack. Never. EVER. So just remember I never did anything wrong.

Edits

I've looked at your edits and some sure look like personal attacks.--Abce2 (talk) 18:36, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well yeah, but who the fuck cares? I only kinda used them much on my talk page! T_T My name is the master of all of the 6's (talk) 18:41, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Already blocked

Yeah, I already got blocked because someone thinks I abused multiple accounts from this user. T_T My name is the master of all of the 6's (talk) 18:46, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

My name is the master of all of the 6's (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This is crazy how they block me. I want to edit again and I'm forced to use the unblock template.

Decline reason:

Yes, that's how it works. You have not provided a reason why you should be unblocked, and so this is declined. In the future, please do not subst: unblock requests. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 18:54, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

My name is the master of all of the 6's (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm no sock puppet of Pickbothmanlol. I'm wishing to be unblocked. Thus and therefore, I had to use the {{unblock}} template.

Decline reason:

Oh well, checkuser says otherwise. —Travis ^talk 19:13, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

My name is the master of all of the 6's (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

PLEASE unblock me. My name is the master of all of the 6's say "Otherwise.".

Decline reason:

Your request to be unblocked is declined because it does not address the reason for your block or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince administrators either (a) that the block was made in error or (b) that the block is no longer necessary because you understand what you are blocked for, you will not do it again and you will make productive contributions instead. Please read our guide to appealing blocks for more information. PMDrive1061 (talk) 20:19, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Oh, com'on! Please unblock me! >_< My name is the master of all of the 6's (talk) 19:53, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think your best chance of getting unblocked is to leave Wikipedia for a year or two. Since you are blocked for, among other things, sock puppetry, you have completely destroyed any and all trust you once had from the community. In order to be unblocked, I would suggest that you go one year without editing Wikipedia at all. If, after one year, you come back and politely ask for an unblock, you might just have a good shot at coming back, but that is completely contingent on you avoiding any and all edits to Wikipedia. 24.99.242.63 (talk) 15:19, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Of course! You need one year of experience before you become an administrator, then by then when I come back, they will unblock me, then I can request for adminship, and then I'll become an administrator! My name is the master of all of the 6's (talk) 22:23, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Of course I'm sure you realize that with that kind of attitude, along with your history of socking and disregard for the rules, you will almost certainly never become an administrator. 24.99.242.63 (talk) 20:29, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

Hi. --Abce2 (talk) 23:33, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]