User talk:My account now

An editor has expressed a concern that this account may be a sockpuppet of Nyannrunning (talk · contribs · logs).
Please refer to the sockpuppet investigation of the sockpuppeteer, and editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful.

Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth

And that editor is wrong.My account now (talk) 04:42, 4 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, we can easily reopen Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Nyannrunning (3rd). It's a slam dunk. No one shows up to edit the Cox article except you. Wanna bet your IP matches one of the score of IPs connected to you in the past, Dooyar? Wildhartlivie (talk) 05:05, 4 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WHL, you have no right to remove posts by whomever this user is without something more than your hunch. Pursue the appropriate steps if you feel the need.

User:My account now, you're a new account and we assume good faith around here; well, some of us do. I've restored the talk page posts of yours that WHL reverted inappropriately. I considered restoring the edits you made to Richard Colvin Cox, as it does not obviously qualify as WP:VANDALISM, but will leave that to you to handle as you will.

Jack Merridew 06:22, 4 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Jack it's really tiring to see you stalking an editor. If you continue I will take this to an administrator to look at how you show up at places where WHL edits that you've never been to before. Please read WP:Stalking to refresh you memory. You keep accusing WHL as only doing reverts a lot. Well if you ever did 'recent changes' patrol, you too would be reverting a lot. Please give it a rest already. Thanks, --CrohnieGal^Talk 16:50, 4 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Jack bug off. You have NO idea of what this sock puppet has done or how often he is newly banned as a new sock account. You're out of line here, and your wikistalking is exceedingly sickening. This is a sock account of Nyannrunning and doesn't even bother to deny it. Please stop wikistalking and denigrating me. You're simply mollycoddling a sock puppet here. Wildhartlivie (talk) 00:35, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Insinuations of sock puppetry at Talk:Rue McClanahan

No, Hydrargyrum is not a banned sockpuppet. I'm a WP editor in good standing. If you had read my user page, you'd know that "hydrargyrum" is a synonym for "quicksilver". More to the point is whether My account now is a sock puppet: I've checked your user page and list of contributions, and it doesn't look very good for you. The account came into being yesterday, June 3, 2010, but your demonstrated use of wiki editing skills tells me you're not new to this environment. Any and all harassment from you will not be tolerated.——Quicksilver^{T @} 19:15, 4 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry my account came into being so recently, but if you read the entire Discussion page for the Richard Colvin Cox article, then you would know I tried to add two legitimate sources to the article, including a 1952 edition of Life magazine that is still sold on Ebay. Another editor with the name "Wildhartlivie" removes everything I try to add to the Cox article either because of her vengeance against Mr. Cox or against me. Hard to know which or what. Apparently, people who are dead or legally missing have to tolerate oblivious Wikipedia editors. This is on my page so I might never know if you read this. I won't add it to your page, which I have read BTW. I won't add anything to Wildhartlivie's page even though she might want me to. Sometimes she wants me to keep talking, other times she doesn't.My account now (talk) 05:11, 6 June 2010 (UTC) My account now (talk) 05:12, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Damn, Dooyar. How would you know that "Sometimes I want you to keep talking and other times I don't? You're new, remember. You should have no experience in what I sometimes might do vs. what I might do other times. Yet another ungraceful slip-up that gives you away. The issue here is that you're a sock puppet and you are not allowed to edit since you have been banned. Get it straight, why don't ya? Oh, and you're about to be blocked again. Wildhartlivie (talk) 05:29, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You're the one who should be blocked because of your picking fights on other people's pages. This isn't your page. You said, "Keep talking" within the last three days. That's how I know sometimes you want me to talk, sometimes you don't. May I presume that banning a new editor is a way of making them not talk?My account now (talk) 20:57, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Exposing your sock puppets isn't picking a fight, it's putting down yet another of your insurrections. Banning a sock puppet is a nice way of saying "go away, you've worn out your welcome." This isn't your talk page either. Bye Bye, Dooyar. Wildhartlivie (talk) 01:03, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Nyannrunning for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Wildhartlivie (talk) 01:29, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]