User talk:My Unique Deoxyribonucleic Acid/sandbox

I really don't know what to say because your page looks so good, and I aspire to have mine look like yours hahahahaha! Anyways, I think the edits you want to make will really benefit the bowfin page, the mistakes you took out and are correcting really make the sentences flow better, and instead of keeping the unnecessary details, your edits get right to the point. I think the images you found and want to add about the different scale types are BEAUTIFUL and really help the reader understand the differences between the four main scale types. I think a great addition to the page would be some images of the dissection you guys do as a group, especially of the internal organs and specific organ systems you may want to work on. Looking at the page, I see there are already some images of dissections added, but I think it would benefit from more focused on a different system that your group members want to learn more about! Overall, it looks really good, the edits you want to add will really benefit the page, and I'm super excited to see how it turns out!

Mako021 (talk) 01:00, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Peer review

Hey,

This is Bi.

General note: This is some quality edits. I love it

Neutral content: you don't seem to take team on this thing, so very well done. The edits are very subtle, to the point, and not very offensive to original poster. Reliable sources: I like how instead of finding new sources, you link other wiki pages. This saves you and the future readers some time. Clear structure:

   Is this draft well organized? Can you follow it easily
  -  very very well organized. You clarify in the beginning which part is the original post, and which parts are your potential edits.
       What pages will be edited?
   -  Fish Anatomy, skin and scales section.
       Who will do the editing/adding of what topics/ pages?
   - Mary will
       What sorts of contributions with regard to images are planned? Do you see where this content might fit from the information provided?
   -  there are a lot of images Mary is planning to add. This will greatly improve the quality of the page, and I, as a reader, can under the images very well.
       Meaning...can you see what part of an article and what page this will go in?
       -  yes

Integration:

   Does anything link up with something you or your team is working on? How can you help each other?
  - not really....
   Do they link to other relevant pages in the text of their draft?
   - yes very
   
   Bitran0205 (talk) 05:05, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Peer Review

Hey this is jasmine doing your peer review! THIS LOOKS ACTUALLY AMAZING1

Neutral content: The content looks very neutral.

Reliable sources: MANY!!!

Clear structure: Yes very clear and well organized.

Is this draft well organized? Can you follow it easily: It is very easy to follow. The edits look great.

What pages will be edited? the fish anatomy page on the bowfin.

Who will do the editing/adding of what topics/ pages? They will be editing the skin and scale section.

Does there seem to be an even distribution of contributions from all team members? Unsure I am unable to see group contributions.

What sorts of contributions with regard to images are planned? Adding images, embedded links, and general info.

Integration: Does anything link up with something you or your team is working on? How can you help each other? I don't think our information could help each other, unfortunately. Jazzmk2000 (talk) 22:35, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]