User talk:Mwnive5

This is Mwnive5's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fredokiss (March 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Fredokiss and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Fredokiss, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 03:49, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mwnive5! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sulfurboy (talk) 03:49, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Sulfurboy thank you for your review on Draft:Fredokiss am sure i attached all Reference on the article include news articles including all proof can you please help me to correct the article we together make Wikipedia better thank you. Mwnive5 (talk) 10:57, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Hello, Mwnive5, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the Teahouse.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Table of contents / Department directory

The Wikipedia Adventure (a tutorial orienting you with Wikipedia)
The Signpost, our newspaper

Need help?

Questions – a guide on where to ask questions
Cheatsheet – quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes
Wikipedia's 5 pillars – an overview of Wikipedia's foundations

Article wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
The simplified ruleset – a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules
Guide to Wikipedia – a thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia

How you can help:

Contributing to Wikipedia – a guide on how you can help

Community portal – Wikipedia's hub of activity

Additional tips...

Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.
If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills without changing the mainspace, the Sandbox is for you.

Mwnive5, good luck, and have fun. King of Scorpions 17:26, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry the welcome was a little late! King of Scorpions 17:27, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

mainspace

@Mwnive5: You seem to be very interested in creating your draft articles. However, I have created an article, and I can tell you that it's not easy. Have you tried editing articles in the Mainspace? (Mainspace meaning articles) King of Scorpions 17:30, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Phyzix (March 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Phyzix and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Phyzix, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 22:36, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @sulfurboy can you help and and show me the material that material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations on Daft:Phyzix please your help will be appreciated Mwnive5 (talk) 22:41, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

My dad i mean Draft:Phyzix Mwnive5 (talk) 22:42, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock Request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mwnive5 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Recently i just logged in my account which had 3 articles and 100 something edits blocked with a reason account sock puppet of Nohaata. I don't understand please help how is my account ralated to the account blocked nohaata did i edit any article about the blocked nohaata account? Please am here by to address myself i have nothing to do with nohaata user i don't you maybe if we connect to the same Wi-Fi somewhere please i have nothing to do with the user nohaata if possible run IP test thank you. Looking forward for my unblock

Decline reason:

The CU results prove blatant abuse of multiple accounts. Talk page access revoked. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 23:17, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.