User talk:Mwalimu1

July 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to AZUSA, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: AZUSA was changed by Mwalimu1 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.950655 on 2011-07-31T04:53:27+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 04:53, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note, the edit in question was the removal of unsourced content which was mistaken for vandalism. Mwalimu1 (talk) 05:02, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mwalimu1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

What is this? I'm no sockpuppet! And I'd like to hear your reasoning behind this! Mwalimu1 (talk) 17:59, 9 August 2011 (UTC)

Decline reason:

This is a {{checkuserblock}}. Please contact WP:BASC to request an unblock. Floquenbeam (talk) 01:03, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Admins will generally not review a checkuser block. —Jeremy v^_^v ^{Components:V S M} 22:20, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry. Any private emails are exactly that - kept private! However, his email address is available on his blog (at the bottom).92.235.168.144 (talk) 22:42, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]