User talk:Mvleblanc

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, the external links you added do not comply with our guidelines for external links. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.--Hu12 19:26, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You should change your username at Wikipedia:Changing username.Usernames that contain a domain or imply a web address are not allowed as usernames and eventually the account will be disabled. see Inappropriate usernames.--Hu12 19:28, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright issue with Environmental Health Foundation of Canada

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Environmental Health Foundation of Canada, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.ehfc.ca/whois.htm. As a copyright violation, Environmental Health Foundation of Canada appears to qualify for speedy deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Environmental Health Foundation of Canada has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. For text material, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source, provided that it is credible.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Environmental Health Foundation of Canada and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Environmental Health Foundation of Canada with a link to where we can find that note.
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Environmental Health Foundation of Canada.

However, for text content, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Butseriouslyfolks 20:37, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Canadian Institute of Public Health Inspectors

A tag has been placed on Canadian Institute of Public Health Inspectors, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read our the guidelines on spam as well as the Wikipedia:Business' FAQ for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —B o L 04:30, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Canadian Institute of Public Health Inspectors

The article Canadian Institute of Public Health Inspectors has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Permastub of non-notable org. Despite 5 yrs, has never had a source other than its own website.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kilopi (talk) 21:56, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]