Jump to content

User talk:Mutos124

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited Haplogroup U (mtDNA), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mozabite (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:15, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

[edit]

You "don't care" that you're falsifying references? That's vandalism. If you do it again, I will block you. — kwami (talk) 04:21, 16 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Actually it's me that is more likely to block you. You are making changes in sourced text that contradicts the source, and there's no excuse for that. As an example, Haplogroup U (mtDNA) where you changed Berber to Moazabite while the source says "with a maximum of 29% in the Algerian Berbers". Or Berber languages where you are adding unsourced figures saying you don't care about the actual source as it's too old (yes, we need a new source, but until we can get a new reliable source, maybe just add (as of 1993) to it?). You seem to be right at Kabyle, but you haven't justified changing "The indigenous Berbers still constitute the majority in Morocco, while they are a significant minority within Algeria which is now a predominantly Arabic-speaking country." to "The Berbers still make a very large community in Morocco and Algeria". The former version is more informative. Dougweller (talk) 14:47, 20 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Haplogroup U6 has a maximum of 29% among Mozabites , its were the "Algerian Berbers" tested , once again I do not edit articles without no reason. Moreover I actually put a new source to it (I mean to the Berber language article) , I will edit it right now , to put things clear. Thirdly , "The indigenous Berbers still constitute the majority in Morocco, while they are a significant minority within Algeria which is now a predominantly Arabic-speaking country": this is an unsourced statement , Morocco has like 30%-40% of Berber speakers while Algeria has 20-30% but in any case both countries have significant Berber speaker communities despite both having an Arabic-speaking majority.

The article that is the source of this is at [1] and does not mention Moazabites. Until you can find a reliable source that backs your claim that it was Moazabites only that were tested, and add that, we have to stick to what the article says. I take your point on the other bit. Meanwhile, please try not to edit logged out. Dougweller (talk) 10:28, 21 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I added another source to confirm what I have edited. Now I hope you'll avoid spamming my talk page accusing me of vandalizing for insignificant things or whatever else. Have a nice day.

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Algeria, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Berber (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:07, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cheikha Rimitti, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rifian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:10, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Arabs in France, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Berber (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 01:51, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nordin Amrabat, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rifian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:22, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:53, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]