User talk:Mustvalge
Welcome!
Hello, Mustvalge, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- Introduction
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- How to write a great article
- Simplified Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ~~~~, which will automatically produce your name and the date.
If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or . Again, welcome!
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 03:23, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
Last
[edit]warning to stop your editwar. --Qumranhöhle (talk) 22:17, 22 July 2020 (UTC) I have warned you: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Edit_warring&diff=prev&oldid=969018975 --Qumranhöhle (talk) 22:26, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
Aramaic
[edit]That edit is vandalism. You replace a basically correct information to something incorrect. Aramaic did not replace cuneiform writing, that's just misinformed/misinformation. Stop your vandalism! --Qumranhöhle (talk) 07:26, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
- you sober my friend? --Mustvalge (talk) 08:36, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
- I am not your friend and you should stop your misinformation. Again: Aramaic did not replace cuneiform writing and this has nothing to do with the different scripts used by Judeans/Jews to write their scriptures which is what the original sentence was about. --Qumranhöhle (talk) 08:50, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
- It's from the article if u read it, in the Origins section: "Aramaic gradually became the lingua franca throughout the Middle East, with the script at first complementing and then displacing Assyrian cuneiform, as the predominant writing system." --Mustvalge (talk) 14:41, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
- There is quite a difference between "displacing Assyrian cuneiform, as the predominant writing system" and "had displaced the Assyrian cuneiform". The first is correct and undisputed, the second is incorrect. Furthermore, you simply deleted the information given before, namely that Judeans/Jews witnessed an interesting change in the use of scripts for writing the scriptures. It is undisputed that the (Old) Hebrew script is rather a sister to the Aramaic branch of the alphabet whereas the Jewish square script descends from the current Aramaic script (and both were quite distinct at that time). Why did you delete that? To use your words: "What are you planning here?" --Qumranhöhle (talk) 17:32, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
- It's from the article if u read it, in the Origins section: "Aramaic gradually became the lingua franca throughout the Middle East, with the script at first complementing and then displacing Assyrian cuneiform, as the predominant writing system." --Mustvalge (talk) 14:41, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
- I am not your friend and you should stop your misinformation. Again: Aramaic did not replace cuneiform writing and this has nothing to do with the different scripts used by Judeans/Jews to write their scriptures which is what the original sentence was about. --Qumranhöhle (talk) 08:50, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
Stop your vandalism or I will have to report you again. --Qumranhöhle (talk) 08:03, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
- This is personal attack what you are doing, i rather not engage in this--Mustvalge (talk) 14:32, 28 July 2020 (UTC)