User talk:Musicwriter 2014

Your submission at Articles for creation: Draft:Cascadia Composers (June 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Draft:Cascadia Composers.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!

Please remember to link to the submission!

You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 19:18, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I don't know where to respond to this or how to ask questions. Please forgive me if I am making a mistake by writing this message here. I received the following message many months ago on April 8, 2015. I have not replied for two reasons: I had health emergencies that forced me to stop working on this project; and I did not know how to proceed. I forwarded all the communications regarding this project to the Cascadia Composers board of directors and asked for their help. One of the members attached to the "About Us" page in the Cascadia Composers website the statement mentioned in the following message from Wikipedia: however, the copyright for Cascadia still appears on that page. A committee of three members have been working on a revision of the article, and we are ready to resubmit it to Wikipedia; however, we don't know if the copyright issue has been correctly handled. Is this the correct way to handle this?

Here is a copy of the message from Wikipedia to which I refer above:

"Hi again Musicwriter. You can't retain non-free copyright (i.e., state "© 2015 Cascadia Composers" at the external site; a claim of non-free copyright ownership) but also post that same content here, because we require additions here to be irrevocably freely-licensed to the world for reuse under our free licenses. To fix this, make a change at the external site. Replace that copyright notice at the bottom with the following: The text of this page is available for modification and reuse under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Sharealike 3.0 Unported License and the GNU Free Documentation License (unversioned, with no invariant sections, front-cover texts, or back-cover texts). If you do that then there's no problem with undeleting the article (drop a note here saying it's done). Alternatively, you can: Send an email from the domain name of the website (thus presenting a form of verification that the email is from a person with authority over the source of the content) – To permissions-en@wikimedia.org, containing a copyright release following the form at Wikipedia:Declaration of consent for all enquiries; After sending the email, create Draft talk:Cascadia Composers with this content: {{OTRS pending}} and I'd also recommend referencing this discussion there. An OTRS volunteer will then reply to your email, indicating whether the content and the license is acceptable and should either undelete the page, or if they are not an administrator, will ask one to undelete it (they sometimes make such requests here). Obviously this alternative option is more involved and less within your control. Of course, that will only take care of the copyright issue allowing undeletion without a problem, but it does not mean the article will be accepted. I can and am willing to help trying to make the article more acceptable for publication once undeleted. That issue always resolves ultimately on whether there are sufficient reliable, secondary sources, entirely independent of the topic, that have written about it substantively (such as books published by major publishing houses, newspapers, magazines, peer-reviewed scholarly journals and websites that meet the same requirements as reputable print-based sources), thus demonstrating notability and allowing a verifiable article to be written. If those source don't exist then it's all for naught. Best regards--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 04:50, 6 April 2015 (UTC)"

Sincerely,

Louise Nedela (Musicwriter 2014)

Draft:Cascadia Composers concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Cascadia Composers, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:34, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Cascadia Composers

Hello Musicwriter 2014. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Cascadia Composers".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Draft:Cascadia Composers}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 03:38, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]