User talk:Musiceasel

Welcome!

Welcome...

Hello, Musiceasel, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like this place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome! Tweedle (talk) 23:26, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Warning for Edit on Woodstock '99

Your edit of Woodstock '99 at 03:17, 31 May 2023 was given no description and removed a large amount of details without any further explanation, as such it will be marked as vandalism. If you persist with further edits without any clear explanation or unjustified removals, you will be further warned, PontiacAurora (talk) 04:21, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Vandalism" is a strong word. The section in question contained a lot of redundant information, some of which was unsourced, and the rest of which could easily be incorporated into the article elsewhere. By the way, you should really learn how to use commas and semicolons properly. Musiceasel (talk) 04:26, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Very mature, I don't see how that's considered redundant. This is blatant vandalism, you're removing sections without ANY notable justification and attacking me for my grammar to excuse for your own conduct PontiacAurora (talk) 04:59, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Look at my last edit, please. Musiceasel (talk) 05:00, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have reviewed your edit and there is nothing describable as "redundant", your point has been taken but please refrain from any further removals without any concrete justification PontiacAurora (talk) 05:03, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Removing edits without justification is still grounds for vandalism 2603:8001:2E07:2D00:B46F:C024:6866:97D9 (talk) 05:24, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

June 2023

Hello, I'm PontiacAurora. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Woodstock '99 have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Removing content without any justification PontiacAurora (talk) 04:59, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Kali Malone

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Kali Malone, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 18:33, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

REQUEST TO SDM FOR EXICUTION OF COURT ORDER OF REFUND OF PROPERTY VALUR WITH 185% INTEREST FROM TDI INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED

REQUEST TO SDM FOR EXICUTION OF COURT ORDER OF REFUND OF PROPERTY VALUR WITH 185% INTEREST FROM TDI INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED 103.68.217.231 (talk) 06:07, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

oh cool bro Musiceasel (talk) 03:47, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In response to your KAP counter-edit

If you believe that the KAP don’t embrace agrarian socialism and it’s a scare word I suggest you read this article.

https://onditmagazine.medium.com/interview-with-drew-pavlou-part-2-bob-katter-the-left-student-protest-10d86115c17e

Socialism is a subjective term and the KAP obviously reject its Marxist definition in favour of a generic proto socialist one. That does not mean the party themselves aren’t socialist, they literally want to eradicate as much privatisation that is feasible. JugoBalkanBoi (talk) 09:34, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Aiwass, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Skyerise (talk) 10:52, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Tkbrett. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Care of Cell 44, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Tkbrett (✉) 12:23, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikilinks

I removed the wikilink that you added to That Thing You Do!. It was misleading. Please read WP:EASTEREGG and avoid adding wikilinks of that nature, thanks. Schazjmd (talk) 21:46, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deep End genre

Hi, there is a discussion on Deep End's talk page that asks for your input. Spectrallights (talk) 21:35, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

October 2024

Hi Musiceasel! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Duck Soup (1933 film) that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Thank you. Belbury (talk) 18:27, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]