Jump to content

User talk:Musicbiblegod

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Article on Nahla Rowe

[edit]

Hello, I have concerns about whether this article is real. I can find no references online to Ms. Rowe's debut album, which seems odd for an album that went top 5. Can you please find more references? Album reviews, news coverage, that kind of thing? Blythwood (talk) 09:40, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Nahla Rowe (singer)

[edit]

Hello, Musicbiblegod,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Nahla Rowe (singer) should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nahla Rowe (singer) .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, Blythwood (talk) 09:43, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Nahla Rowe (singer)

[edit]

Hello Musicbiblegod,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Nahla Rowe (singer) for deletion, because it seems to be vandalism or a hoax.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Blythwood (talk) 10:15, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

December 2015

[edit]

Information icon Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Nahla Rowe (singer). Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. 331dot (talk) 10:50, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 hours for repeatedly removing a deletion template from an article you created. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 10:58, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]