User talk:Murp64

Thank you for experimenting with the page Arnold Schwarzenegger on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. --Esteban F. 00:55, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Walcott 0607astonvilla.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Walcott 0607astonvilla.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 01:11, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Don't be a dick

You may want to peruse: Don't be a dick Erechtheus 04:57, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to User:Erechtheus

Please stop targeting one or more user's pages or talk pages for abuse or insults, unwarranted doctoring or blanking. It can be seen as vandalism and may get you blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- Gogo Dodo 04:22, 31 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Danielcross.jpg

I noticed that the Daniel Cross article had a problem with its infobox when I was checking your history for other vandalism. I fixed it, but I also discovered the non-conforming Danielcross.jpg image that needed to be tagged for deletion. You may want to read WP:IFD -- the image will be deleted in a week if the problems with it are not corrected, but you may be able to fix the problems and see the image kept. Sincerely, Erechtheus 05:11, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, there is an official template to use to warn you about the problems. Here it is. It may be more helpful:

Unspecified source for Image:Danielcross.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Danielcross.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Erechtheus 05:13, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Collingwoodtop.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Collingwoodtop.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 16:05, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

The Gregory Bean Show

The article The Gregory Bean Show has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article seemed to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the notability of the subject may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki (talk) 15:29, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]