User talk:Murdockh

Seeing red

Yes, seeing that, seeing that they had replaced nearly an entire article with advertisement... I can only hope I didn't sound like a total jerk at WP:AIV (I think they've seen enough that they can tell when someone is typing while yelling). And they were going on to other articles... Arrggh! (BTW: I think it does help that the miscreants see messages from multiple people - sorry about erasing your first comment - I try to keep a sense of humor, and so the edit summary "(replace indignation along with lame reply)" was talking about restoring my sputtering and his reply) Shenme 09:59, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OBTW: I see the troublemaker will trouble you no more (at least under that name)

09:48, 10 March 2007 Riana dzasta (Talk | contribs) blocked "DBZ Bane (contribs)" (anon. only, account creation blocked) with an expiry time of indefinite (disruptive vandalism on DBZ-related pages, no positive contributions)

were you keeping the graffiti for evidence? Ah, well, good night. Shenme 10:05, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thought it might be good to keep it there until he/she/it was dealt with at least. And besides, my first user-page vandalism and talk-page dirt-slinging was a bit interesting, to tell you the truth. ;) Murdockh 10:07, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your VandalProof Application

Dear Murdockh,

Thank you for applying for VandalProof! (VP). As you may know, VP is a very powerful program, and in fact the just released 1.3 version has even more power. Because of this we must uphold strict protocols before approving a new applicant. Regretfully, I have chosen to decline your application at this time. The reason for this is that at this time you do not meet the minimum requirement of 250 edits to mainspace articles (see under main here). Please note it is nothing personal by any means, and we certainly welcome you to apply again soon. Thank you for your interest in VandalProof. Daniel Bryant 08:30, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Duly noted, and of course I understand. I will certainly apply again soon. Murdockh 10:41, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your spurious warning on my talk page is unwarranted

Be advised that spurious warnings are unacceptable behavior. My comment referred directly to the unreliable sources that were cited, not to the editor. [1] Atsme☯^Consult 16:56, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

RC Patrol-related Proposals in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey

Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!

This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:

Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)

Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.

Note: You received this message because you have transcluded {{User wikipedia/RC Patrol}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.

Best regards, Stevietheman — Delivered: 01:12, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]