User talk:Multiplerre

Welcome

Hello, Multiplerre, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 12:44, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Directories and indexes Department directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Our help forum for new editors, the Teahouse The Help Desk, for more advanced questions Help pages Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

This is Multiplerre's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Technical sports racing (May 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Technical sports racing and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Technical sports racing, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 12:44, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Multiplerre! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 12:44, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020

Hello, Multiplerre, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as Portablepowerstation (talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 00:29, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes i will use only one account I do not know why portable power station account came in above utterrance but i will write only from one account according to wikipedia guidelines

There maybe other computers using same ip range at place where i reside now or there are emblem simmilarities.

Multiplerre (talk) 01:00, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You made practically the exact same edit to WT:WPM with this account (here) as you did with Portablepowerstation (here, partly while logged out also). The common IP address excuse is ridiculous; I otherwise have no access to your IP addresses except for the fact that you made a couple of these common edits while logged out. It's clear the same person is responsible for both of them. You must declare this according to the instructions about multiple accounts in the warning above and follow the policies about using multiple accounts. Failure to do so will result in a report at WP:SPI, where you risk being blocked. Moreover, you seem to to have copied an experienced editor's user page for your own with this account. This is also not okay, as it falsely represents your on-wiki activities. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 01:33, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Is Collectively compact linear operators written by you?

Hello Multiplerre, where is Collectively compact linear operators from?

If it is written by you, do note that Wikipedia isn't a publisher of original thought or of scientific papers, so this article is likely to be deleted.

– Thjarkur (talk) 19:47, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes It is written by me i have limited internet now again as i residence in Mcdonalds till 22:15 ,It is my own researches of mathematics done by 2 sources more of my researches you can find here www.photogallery8.webnode.com.

Multiplerre (talk) 20:54, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oh I see. It had some signs of being copy pasted from a PDF file, for example the line breaks, page numbers, and a header.

Wikipedia can't publish original research and doesn't publish "papers" as such. I've moved your article to userspace under User:Multiplerre/Collectively compact linear operators. There you can either edit it to turn it into an encyclopedic article that summarizes sources, or you can copy it over to your website. I would recommend looking at how articles on related topics here are set up, they all start with an accessible definition of what the subject is. They then summarize what reliable published sources have said.

Feel free to write to me if you need assistance with editing. I can't quite help with the mathematics, but I can help with how to create a structure for a Wikipedia article.

– Thjarkur (talk) 21:57, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Multiplerre (talk) 12:41, 7 August 2020 (UTC)I am tired i did not sleep all night and now is 13:04 will do it asap.[reply]

Multiplerre (talk) 04:13, 15 August 2020 (UTC) i have internet now but all time have some excuses to not improve article, i will take short lay on bed and hopefully after that will start to imprve it here sth[reply]

OPLS-DA moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, OPLS-DA, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Captain Calm (talk) 18:25, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Technical sports racing

Hello, Multiplerre. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Technical sports racing".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 22:10, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:OPLS-DA

Hello, Multiplerre. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "OPLS-DA".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 20:58, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]