User talk:Mujahid Ahmad

Requesting for the edit involvement for the article Aisha

Hi i am Omer, i request your kind self to help me out to make the article Aisha a organized and model article for viewers, there are some users who had challenged the references of this article, and based on my research knowledge, references and poor comand on english, i am not able to work out for those, therfore kindly help me to make the article Aisha organized. Thanks and pls advice --Omer123hussain123 (talk) 11:22, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your userpage

Hi, you might have noticed I made a little change in your userpage. It would be to all our benefit if the information was not replaced, at least until you are a little older. Cheers, LessHeard vanU (talk) 17:41, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

May 2011

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Aisha, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 17:13, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning; the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Aisha, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 17:21, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You can't do that, I am changing it because you are deleting my edits for no reason.

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 17:40, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, i didn't know that. Thanks.

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Aisha. Users are expected to collaborate with others and avoid editing disruptively.

In particular, the three-revert rule states that:

Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 20:18, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring, as you did at Aisha. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Favonian (talk) 17:26, 2 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.