User talk:Muilenta

Muilenburg

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Muilenburg, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Muilenburg is a test page.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Muilenburg, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 06:40, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of "Tony Muilenburg"

Tony Muilenburg, a page you created, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how they are important or significant, and thus why they should be included in an encyclopedia. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and the guidelines for biographies in particular..

You are welcome to contribute content that complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. ERK^talk 21:11, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tony Muilenburg for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tony Muilenburg is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tony Muilenburg until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ERK^talk 21:31, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Your email

Hi! This is in response to your email to me. I understand the mission of WikiProject Universities is to increase coverage of universities and academics on the encyclopedia. At this time, I do not believe the subject passes the standards for notability at WP:PROF and WP:N. Please feel free to comment on why you think this subject should be included in an encyclopedia by adding your thoughts to the article's deletion discussion. I encourage you to review our notability guidelines, and add your perspective to the discussion. --ERK^talk 22:04, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest editing

Hello, Muilenta. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about in the article Tony Muilenburg, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:

avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the {{request edit}} template);
when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. Melcous (talk) 02:03, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]