User talk:Muhammad Mahd

CS1 error on Pakistani nationality law

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Pakistani nationality law, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 11:15, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023

Hello, I'm Shadow311. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Bangladeshi nationality law seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Shadow311 (talk) 16:58, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes it is a mistake, I simply changed the citation from the Pakistani Nationality Law to the Citizenship Law of Pakistan.

Thank you. Muhammad Mahd (talk) 17:03, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Page move on Pakistani nationality law

Hi there. I reverted your page move changing the title of Pakistani nationality law to "Citizenship Law of Pakistan". You cited MOS:AT as justification for the page move, but this guideline requires that article titles be consistent with related articles. All other article titles for nationality laws follow the format "demonym nationality law" (see Category:Nationality law). Thank you, Horserice (talk) 18:12, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring on Pakistani nationality law

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Pakistani nationality law. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Horserice (talk) 20:28, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]