User talk:Muhammad Ali Khalid

April 2015 (blocked from editing Wikipedia for undisclosed paid editing)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for undisclosed paid editing, in direct violation of Wikipedia's Terms of Use.. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Yunshui ^雲 _水 12:11, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Yunshui. I do not know why I have been blocked. I cannot access the OTRS, can you please tell me the reason why I have been blocked?Muhammad Ali Khalid (talk) 12:49, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been soliciting money for editing Wikipedia, without disclosing this fact on Wikipedia itself. This is a direct violation of the Foundation's Terms of Use. Yunshui ^雲 _水 12:51, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

But Yunshui that was about a year ago and I was blocked for that and then it was over.

Your email copied in OTRS is from last week. I'm aware that you cannot view the ticket, however I am sure you are aware of your recent business activities. Yunshui ^雲 _水 12:54, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yunshui Can you please share it with me?

Doing so would be a violation of the OTRS policy, so no. I note also that the article for which you were requesting payment is only a few weeks old, so your claim that you have ceased editing for pay is disingenuous to say the least. Yunshui ^雲 _水 12:58, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Which article is it Yunshui?Muhammad Ali Khalid (talk)

Again. privacy concerns prevent me from revealing that specific information. How many articles have you requested payment for in the last month or two? If the volume is so great that you don't even know which one I'm referring to, then your paid editing is a more serious concern than I thought. Yunshui ^雲 _水 13:01, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yunshui I have not requested anybody any payment for any article. That's why I am asking. Muhammad Ali Khalid (talk) 13:02, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you are not prepared to be honest with me, then I have no interest in continuing this discussion. Yunshui ^雲 _水 13:03, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yunshui, I am being honest with you.

Yunshui, I have not made the account Gujjar Daw. Please do a check user and that will confirm that I am telling the truth.Muhammad Ali Khalid (talk)

Note to reviewing admin Please see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Vamsiraj: I'm now at least convinced beyond reasonable doubt that User:Gujjar Daw is not, in fact, Muhammad Ali Khalid. Yunshui ^雲 _水 19:47, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Muhammad Ali Khalid (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am requesting unblocking of my account. The unblock guide says that one should first understand the reason why one has been blocked. However, I am just told that I have done paid editing and that my account has been blocked. I don't understand this reason. Someone sent an email in OTRS and my account was blocked. Anybody can send any email. I understand that there are privacy concerns, but I should be allowed to view that email and present my side of the case. This email could be 2 years old when I did paid editing first and was blocked for that. Secondly, User:Gujjar Daw, whose account was closed as being my sock puppet has nothing to do with me. This guy was trying to create the page, Sher Medaan Da, which he had been trying to created since 12 April. And this page is related to User:Vamsiraj who already has several sock puppets. A checkuser would reveal that I have nothing in common with any of his sock puppets.Muhammad Ali Khalid (talk) 03:58, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Please lodge your appeal using the Unblock Ticket Request System so that the private evidence may be adequately addressed. MER-C 05:16, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hello Salvidrim!, I requested my account to be unblocked through the UTRS, but it was declined with the response that this is my website. However, this is not. Muhammad Ali is the most common name in the Muslim world and this happens to be just another person who works in the same city as I am in. He is a web developer, whereas I was only a writer. I did do paid editing, but I was blocked for that about 15 months ago and then that was that.Muhammad Ali Khalid (talk) 03:44, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Help Needed

Hello Mark Arsten, I need a little help from you. I have been blocked and I believe the block is a result of a misunderstanding. I am writing to you because you blocked me about two years ago for paid editing. At that time, I did do paid editing and I was blocked for two weeks. Anyway, recently I was blocked because someone sent an email in the OTRS. I haven't seen the email. I tried the UTRS but I got an unrelated response, which I have discussed below. Anyway since I cannot respond to the email from UTRS and since the evidence is private, can you please review it. I have not been given any chance of explaining the email. I am pretty sure, this email would have been from 2 years ago. If I give you my email address here, can you send that email to me?

The response that I got from the UTRS was am declining your request because it doesn't look like you're being completely honest with us due to your conflict of interest: http://www.muhammadalikhalid.com/search-engine-optimization/ This website is not mine. Muhammad Ali is the most common name in the Muslim world and this happens to be just another person who works in the same city as I am in. He is a web developer, whereas I was only a writer.

Lastly, I do know that posting message here again and again is a violation and I could be blocked for it. But I feel that nobody is listening to me. If you can please review the evidence with me, I will not post here again. Thanks Muhammad Ali Khalid (talk) 11:34, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Help Needed

Hello Acalamari, I need a little help from you. I have been blocked and I believe the block is a result of a misunderstanding. I have selected you randomly from the list of active administrators. I was blocked for paid editing about two years ago. At that time, I did do paid editing and I was blocked for two weeks. Anyway, recently I was blocked because someone sent an email in the OTRS. I haven't seen the email. I tried the UTRS but I got an unrelated response, which I have discussed below. Anyway since I cannot respond to the email from UTRS and since the evidence is private, can you please review it. I have not been given any chance of explaining the email. I am pretty sure, this email would have been from 2 years ago. If I give you my email address here, can you send that evidence to me? If this is some evidence that for which I have been blocked, don't you think that I have the right to see it?

The response that I got from the UTRS was am declining your request because it doesn't look like you're being completely honest with us due to your conflict of interest: http://www.muhammadalikhalid.com/search-engine-optimization/ This website is not mine. Muhammad Ali is the most common name in the Muslim world and this happens to be just another person who works in the same city as I am in. He is a web developer, whereas I was only a writer.

Even if you choose not to help me, please just let me know. Thanks.Muhammad Ali Khalid (talk) 16:50, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Heritage School System for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Heritage School System is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heritage School System until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Störm (talk) 15:26, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of The Future Project

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on The Future Project, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Atlantic306 (talk) 00:17, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:BodyCode Training System.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:BodyCode Training System.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:34, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The Future Project Logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Future Project Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:51, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Solomon Akhtar for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Solomon Akhtar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Solomon Akhtar until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Laun chba ller 15:28, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Center on Business and Poverty Logo.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Center on Business and Poverty Logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:08, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Algoma Central Corporation Logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Algoma Central Corporation Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:18, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Lacons Brewery Logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Lacons Brewery Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:27, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Alenia Aeronautica Logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Alenia Aeronautica Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:22, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of programs broadcast by Geo Entertainment for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of programs broadcast by Geo Entertainment is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of programs broadcast by Geo Entertainment until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

CNMall41 (talk) 22:00, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]