Jump to content

User talk:Mufka/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3→Archive 5

Thanks!

Thanks for the advice, yeah I've just noticed that sort of thing happening myself actually. Guess I'll just have to check after I revert in future. LibLord 22:52, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for reverting the vandalism by 24.47.198.164. Please place a warning on the talk page, and I am going to ask an administrator to block this account. Cheers! ---Charles 00:54, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

Boy, you are top notch! Here I go over to AiV to report this anonymous user, and I find that you beat me to the punch. Thanks again! ---Charles 00:59, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

Excuse me

I'm not that great at computers; and I just made simple mistake. I thought I could delete a warning if I thought it was just a mistake. How could I contact the bot owner? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 146.115.72.52 (talk • contribs) 17:10, 3 December 2006 (UTC).

Re:75.67.216.103

Heh. You think you're going to stop me, kid? Revert all you like. I'm going to be here until the tyranny is gone. Everything you do is useless, you might as well quit now. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 75.68.55.235 (talk • contribs) 06:49, 4 December 2006 (UTC).

Prussian Blue (duo)

See User talk:151.203.15.96. That guy's a long term vandal...he's been posting the same crap to that article for months. -- Jim Douglas (talk) (contribs) 03:57, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

Peru Township, Huron County, Ohio

Hello, Thank you for your stub submission. You may wish to note that it is preferable to use a stub template from Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Stub types instead of using simply {{stub}}, if you can. Thanks! --Vox Causa 01:57, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

Quoting you

I just wanted to show you my new userbox:

"I think, therefore I revert." – User:Mufka

—ScouterSig 16:04, 19 December 2006 (UTC)


Welcome to VandalProof!

Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Mufka! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 16:50, 27 December 2006 (UTC)

Oops

Sorry, I posted my 'diet' line into the wrong window, hence wrong wikipedia article. It was not deliberate vandalism (I'm aware there was no diet variety of gasoline released in 2003!) :)

203.57.241.67 02:24, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

Your report on WP:AIV

Only because of one diff? – [1]. Don't do it again, please. — Nearly Headless Nick 15:43, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

It has been my understanding that if an anon vandal vandalizes within a reasonable period of a last warning (24 hours would qualify) that the ip is subject to block. Since the IP seemed to be on a rampage yesterday and received the whole range of warnings it was reasonable to submit the IP for block today only 15 hours after the last warning. I have done this several times in the past without chastisement. Your kind guidance would be appreciated. Mufka 15:53, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
The user was blocked by another administrator, I would not have done it. Outright vandalism is not the enemy of Wikipedia; subtle and sneaky vandalism is. The user, who probably was a newbie, would change into a troll and would contribute even more destructively. Sometimes, we just should not bite them, lest they become trolls. All the best. — Nearly Headless Nick 16:03, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

vines

Im sorry because this must be very embarassing for you, but Vines high school does have a meow chior. So if you would be so kind as to not delete things before you do a little reaserch. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.164.182.246 (talk • contribs)

After speaking with an administrator at Vines High School, your edit is confirmed as nonsense. The revert and warning will stand. If you find a source that you can cite that proves this wrong, please include it in your revision. -- Mufka (user) (talk) (contribs) 15:23, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

Re: My Username

Posted by Mufka: I saw you posting a warning message on a vandal's talk page and I was thinking that you were a bot or something. The reason I'm leaving a note is that I thought you might run up against a complaint about your username violating the username policy. The policy seems gray in some areas but you might want to review it yourself Username policy. I'd hate to see you build up a reputation as a RC Patroller only to have to change your username. Good Luck. -- Mufka (user) (talk) (contribs) 03:22, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for your concern, Mufka. I have reviewed Wikipedia's policy on usernames, and I don't think that mine falls in any of the categories of inappropriate names. Most bots I have seen include the suffix "-bot" and I have seen none with the prefix "wiki". I would like to keep my username the same for the time being; however, if there is something I am missing or any other problems, please feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Wikieditor06 22:47, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for your concern regarding my Japanese signature. I believe it is now something more befitting the guidelines suggested in the signature guidelines. I am still fairly inexperienced as far as signature formatting goes. It is not something I have worked with in significant amounts. 黒雲 <---Nickname(Japanese kanji meaning 'dark cloud'); Username---> Qaddosh 14:28, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

answer

Hello, sorry about the block on sight I just followed the instruction leaved by the template used on top (if further vandalism : block) (or if it wasn't the case it may be because I lack of caffein right now ^^') . -- Esurnir

  • Or is it because I reported a guy after giving only a test4 ?. -- Esurnir 21:05, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
    • Hmmm the last time I did that, I think it was after a progressive blanking pattern (means, blanking litle part by litle part, to avoid detection by our software), when I see that "pattern" I asked on irc wich warning would be appropriate, and told them about test4im ("Only warning" instead of last warning) and first they told me test3 then said "oh forgot about it, take this one"). Any advice about wich warning to take next time ? -- Esurnir 21:18, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
Thanks May I take a cookie :) ? -- Esurnir 21:32, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

Beat me to the sign fix

Was just putting in the unsigned template, when I discovered you'd fixed that for me on User talk:24.21.67.28. Thanks for watching my back! -- GJD 16:16, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

Re: Maitland Middle School

Hey there, thanks for the heads up.

The protection did work, the developers put in the ability to expire protection when it is placed. I just sprotected for two days since vandals usually lose interest. I have reprotected and extended it for two weeks. I appreciate the notice. Happy editing to you! Teke (talk) 02:36, 6 February 2007 (UTC)


Forgive my ignorance :-)

I am so new to this and dont know if ive done something wrong or right - i was trying to create a wiki page for my mom and got Conflict of Interest and other comments and cant tell if the page will be deleted or not. I dont even know if i am placing this comment in the right place - so again, forgive my ignorance and let me know what ive done wrong, or right. thanks. Cyphizzle (talk)

My answer is here -- Mufka (user) (talk) (contribs) 02:01, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

re. the 'Acid' edit: I was just trying to roll back to a version that had not been vandalized. I wound up doing 3 rollbacks, as there was multiple instances, and someone was actively vandalizeing while I was in the process of rolling back. I've never even tried editing before, so if I did it incorrectly, I appologize. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.115.28.119 (talk • contribs)

Ooops

I attempted to make an archive of my old message on my discussion page but instead I think I may have created a new user. Could you please visit my discussion page to see what I'm talking about. I hope to figure how to do this correctly and fix whatever dumb mistake I made.--WilliamC24 19:05, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

My answer is here -- Mufka (user) (talk) (contribs) 21:45, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

Posting to the User_talk pages of IP Addresses

I'm on a dynamic IP address. The guy who was your vandal for the Marco Materazzi page was the person who held this IP address before me. I wont have this IP address tomorrow.

Seriously, don't bother complaining to IP addresses. Most of them change, and most of the ones that don't are corporate. --220.253.53.236 11:29, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

Response

Hello, regarding the message you left on my talk page. If discussion on this possible future policy comes ahead, I will be very interested in being involved. I hope to hear from you soon. :-) Jacobshaven3 17:33, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

Your comment on user talk page policy

I noticed that you posted a comment on Village Pump about the ambiguous nature of user talk page usage policy. I'm of the opinion that user talk pages are a community resource, especially in the case of vandalism warnings. I'm planning to initiate discussion on the possibility of defining a policy on what is and what is not proper behavior when it comes to deleting vandalism warnings on one's own talk page. Let me know if you are interested in this debate and I'll let you know when it is open for discussion again. -- Mufka (user) (talk) (contribs) 18:03, 23 February 2007 (UTC-6)

I am interested. I would have two main goals.
  1. Keep persistent vandals from succeeding in deleting warnings.
  2. Convince people to keep in progress conversations on their talk page rather than deleting new posts immediately "to show they have been read." I would prefer to see everyone archive their talk pages and wait for conversations to age first. (However, I am all for them deleting immediately personal attacks and related posts. It is amazing how often User:AntiVandalBot and User talk:AntiVandalBot were vandalized by someone claiming the bot was itself a vandal back in December.)
Will (Talk - contribs) 21:22, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
I'm also interested. I also think that they are community records and they are a record of communication. That communication should not have to be hard for people to go through. While a low volume talk page can be easy to go back and view a removed warning, could you imagine digging through your talk page for one? or mine? I think we should start with something simple, like all valid communication should never be deleted from talk pages, only archived. Then also reach a consensus on appropriate archiving time, i.e. 7 days unless a discussion is of particular size and at least 3 days old.--Crossmr 03:22, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

Removal of warning

The removal was in a failed effort to stop the "New Message" alert from displaying on every page I saw. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.34.0.92 (talk) 03:24, 28 February 2007 (UTC).


Swivel New Media

Swivel1 fixed the neutrality/advertisement problems on Swivel New Media and so I removed the {{hangon}} tag. Please let that user know if you still have issues with the article. I'm just letting you know about the speedy deletion tag removal. --Strangerer 05:48, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

???

Okay, why does my article always get flagged? I started the page so that others could contribute, but they won't unless there's something to find. What the hell constitutes "notable"? I see some pages that have 2 lines of content and they don't get flagged for deletion...what gives?Drummer120 05:19, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

My response here -- Mufka (user) (talk) (contribs) 00:39, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

Gray Tuesday

That's what local papers in the Columbus, OH area are calling it... but I'm not arguing any deletion -If your referring to the name being nonsense, I don't know if it is or not (like I said, LOCAL papers), but the story's real
[2] — Preceding unsigned comment added by LaotianBoy1991 (talk • contribs)

My response here -- Mufka (user) (talk) (contribs) 00:40, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

-- Sorry for all this trouble, but no, I do not have one with me. I am not set on this name, or am fighting for this name, I just have not seen it referred to as anything else so I also used this title — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.210.50.211 (talk • contribs)

Gray tuesday

I declined your speedy deletion proposal on the above article because I didn't believe it was patent nonsense as you tagged it. It may also have been written by someone for whom English is not a first language, and the term may be being used in Chinese or another language other than English. Although I didn't feel quite comfortable speedying it, you are definitely free to tag the article, leave a note on the creator's talkpage, or prod it to make sure that if we wind up keeping the article it meets our standards. Thanks for your interest. Regards, Newyorkbrad 00:11, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

Vandals removing vandalism warnings

It's being discussed again, here: [3]. ~ Kathryn NicDhàna ♫♦♫ 08:05, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

removal of vandalism warnings

A discussion is underway: [1]. -- Mufka (user) (talk) (contribs) 10:55, 7 March 2007 (UTC-6)

Thanks. I should note there that Firefox 2.0.0.2 detected a problem with the security certificate sent by the server. Will (Talk - contribs) 19:35, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

Sorry

New here. didnt realise anyone could edit. not do it again — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.33.241.216 (talk • contribs)


Thank You

I am glad that you would help me as I am just joining wikipedia, reguarding the "hidden comment" on the Dodge Hornet page. I am sorry about that, for I am rather new. However, I want to thank you again, so much for helping me out. I promise it will not happen again. I learn from my mistakes... =} I am also sorry for not following the rules of Wiki, I will research rather than taking direct information from copyrighted sources, thank you, and good day. Online now 03:18, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

Comments left by User:Online now

You might want to check out the User_talk:Online_now page. He responded to your copyright vio post. Why am I telling you this? The user posted that reply to me—instead of you—so I'm trying to unravel the mess. Best of luck! --BaseballDetective 21:09, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

Reguarding "Dodge Hornet"

This specific part I had never added, I just rearranged it, and added the first paragraph from it

"*Engine - 1.6ltr 4-cylinder (Supercharged)

  • Power - 170bhp
  • 0-60mph - 7.5 seconds
  • Top Speed - 135mph+
  • Price - £14,000est.

With its wide stance, the Hornet is solidly planted on the road. Up front, the signature Dodge crossbar grille is set above an exposed engine intercooler flanked by front brake air ducts and fog lamps. The raised plateau on the hood features a recessed scoop on the driver’s side to funnel air to the engine air box. Underhood is a 1.6L 16-valve OHC supercharged I/C four-cylinder engine putting out 127 kW (170 hp)/224 N m (165 lb.-ft.) of torque @ 4000 rpm. The Dodge Hornet is a concept car designed and developed by Dodge and revealed in 2006. It was Dodges first attempt at building a car this small, it is ready to hit the road in 2008. It is a rally inspired design based on the Jeep Compass platform, powered by a 1.6 L supercharged 4-cylinder engine rated at 170 hp, taken from the 2005 Mini Cooper S. The Hornet has a throaty engine note louder than Dodges V10 Viper, and the performance of this car really is not surprising given Dodges history of building 'quick' cars with the New Charger and the Challenger soon to be arriving on UK roads. It can rapidly accelerate from 0-60 in 7.5 seconds, which is the same as the 'Checkmate Mini', and at £14,000 it is £4,000 less than the Mini The Hornets doors open like that of the Mazda RX8.

The Hornet name comes from the AMC Hornet that was built by American Motors from 1970-1977. AMC was acquired by Chrysler (Dodge's parent) in 1987."

If this is what you are saying I copied, I had never even touched that.

  • Bold- I did add that, without ever even seeing the websites that you have posted.

I also have a question:

Me being new and all, I was wondering if I have any further questions, if I may come to you. I thank you very much for talking to me in a calm way, that is not snooty. Thank you for answering all my questions, as I know you will this one too.

I am sorry for the newness and so sudden problems I have created, I am really working hard on this. Please be patient with me, and thanks again.

If you are referring to the specific parts I've added, please let me know. I am not trying to acuse you of being wrong or lieing

Thanks, Online now 21:09, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

My response is here. -- Mufka (user) (talk) (contribs) 21:49, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

Discussion at Talk:List of the Oldest People

There is a discussion about whether the article should be merged with Oldest people. Squirepants101 19:19, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

Blackpool

Thanks for your message about reverting the edit about early Blackpool history. I did notice the coyrighted source only after I added it. If however, the early history of Blackpool was added but without using the exact wording from that source, in other words reworded, or used from a non-copyright source, would that be acceptable? Thank you Tangerines 20:19, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

I forgot to add that I have also contacted Blackpool Tourist Office to request permission to use sections from that article. Tangerines 20:25, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

My response is here -- Mufka (user) (talk) (contribs) 20:30, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

IP messages bar

Hi, I just searched at bugzilla and I found the bug that we just experienced [4]. The problem for me is that the new messages bar won't show up no matter how many pages I browse on a IP address. While for you, the problem is the opposite (orange bar stays stuck). This problem is also more widespread than I though it was as evidenced here:

-- Hdt83 Chat 01:14, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

JView

I saw that you deleted some additions to the JView wiki entry. Just curious as to why? Bobafettbv 21:13, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

My response is here. -- Mufka (user) (talk) (contribs) 21:20, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

So sorry about my daughters...

I am Robert Bateman, the man with three, somewhat obviously feuding daughters who have been vandalizing the page which is about their father, with comments about each other. I apologize for their actions, and when I see them this weekend, will try to rein them in. Sorry about that. Had I known what they were up to I would have had a word with them earlier. I only just learned about this today. Thanks for your patience.

--RobertBateman 18:37, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

Pigeon Forge Police Department

Hello ... I have restored the {{notability}} tag on this article after it was removed without comment (my comment is on the talk page) ... I don't want to get into a WP:3RR war with the author, who has also been adding redlinks to List of law enforcement agencies in Montana (or maybe they've been recently deleted as NN) ... would you keep an eye on this, please? —68.239.79.97 (talk · contribs) 14:22, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

I am working with a new editor to try to improve the page. It's their first page ever created. Please allow some slack as the article has improved quite a bit so far. I would like to remove the notability tag so we can work on it during the next few days without the threat of deletion hanging over our head. It would be discouraging to a new user if all their contributions were deleted. VK35 02:13, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
My response here. -- Mufka (user) (talk) (contribs) 13:18, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

Hey

It's Harebag, Mufka. I recently joined newpages patroller. Anyway I found two users who think they can use Wikipedia as they see it. Their names are User:‎Ethioprincess7 and User:76.64.32.127. I taged their article for speedy deletion. It's name was Rahwa Leakemariam. I am not trying to make trouble but I know Wikipedia doesn't allow this kind of behavior. I admit I've got very angry at times but I've tried to follow the guidelines. I would appreciate it if you would keep me anonymous, I don't want them to vandalise my articles. Thanks.Harebag 02:35, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

My response here -- Mufka (user) (talk) (contribs) 03:07, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

Hey

Can I delete the pages marked for speedy deletion?Harebag 11:55, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

My response is here. -- Mufka (user) (talk) (contribs) 12:45, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

Time Stamp

Sorry about the manipulated time stamp, I was copy and pasting the warnings cos they're quicker and I guess I must have copied my name and date, instead of four tildes. I'll try not to let it happen again! Thanks for the heads up! Whiskey in the Jar 13:39, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

VandalProof

I see you reverted my changed to the box for the margin. This box is now the only one on my user page that appears out of line and looks odd. I understand you may have changed the image for a good reason but could you review the revert? Barfbagger 14:28, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

My response is here -- Mufka (user) (talk) (contribs) 15:48, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

On the machine I'm currently on it looks OK again. Sometimes you have to bypass the cache to get the updated version to show so maybe that's why it didn't look perfect - mind you I haven't got my glasses on! Barfbagger 17:05, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

Your NPWatcher Application

Dear Mufka,

Thank you for applying for NPWatcher! You've been approved to use it. Before you run the program, please check the changelog on the application page to see if there is a newer release (or just add the main page (here) to your watchlist). Report any bugs or feature suggestion here. If you need help, feel free to contact me or join NPWatcher.

Martinp23 22:05, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Ichihashi.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Ichihashi.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you.

(Non-boilerplate: The article's been merged to the murder victim's article. Not sure if putting the image there would be relevant since Ichihashi gets barely 1 para, but if you think it would be, feel free to put it in.) Johnleemk | Talk 07:45, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

Thanks, I've deleted the image. Johnleemk | Talk 11:25, 24 April 2007 (UTC)


User:Harebag

I saw you opened up a suspected sock puppet page for this user. I had similiar thoughts a couple of days ago and left a note on his adopter's talk page (don't know if you saw it or not), hoping that maybe his adopter could say something to him since my previous interactions with Harebag hadn't gone too well. I don't know what came of that, but as the problematic edits have continued, I'm glad that you took the next step. janejellyroll 03:22, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

Please do not attack me, particularily about the comment that I have been around only a few more days than Harebag. As noted on my original talk page (since edited out), my wife taught me the ins and outs of wikipedia resulting in me being a more advanced users than others who joined around the same date. As you can see, my edits are all very logical, non-controversial, and well referenced. VK35 17:06, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

My response is here -- Mufka (user) (talk) (contribs) 19:51, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

Your explanation and comment (response) noted. I'm ready to get back to editing! Writing comments trying to explain is time consuming. In real life, I work with people which is why trying to help newbies, trying to mediate edit disputes (with other editors, not Harebag) is part of what I don't mind doing in wikipedia, in addition to plain editing and starting a few new articles.VK35 20:02, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

On a different subject, I was curious to what you write about. It wasn't readily apparent. From the beginning, you did a lot of reverting but have you created any articles or made many edits to one or two articles or made some edits to a lot of article on one subject? Is your interest mainly reverting vandalism and not editing?VK35 20:09, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

Last Time!

DO NOT draw user VK35 into this mess. I'm finished with wikipedia. You people were never reasonable with me so I'm not going to be reasonable with you. I've got better things to do if you guys just want to nag at me.Harebag 18:29, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

J D Rapley

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=J_D_Rapley&action=history - we put the db template on at the exact same time, but I didn't get an edit conflict. Hm. Corvus cornix 21:06, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

I'd blame NPWatcher. I'll keep an eye on it to see it happens again. -- Mufka (user) (talk) (contribs) 21:42, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

It seems I have a fine line to walk

I admit and apolgize for using JV17 disruptivly in edit wars. If you want to report me or not it is up to you. If you do not however I promise to do the following,

  • 1.Never be involved in a edit war again.
  • 2.Never use JV17 again.
  • 3.If I use another user account I will use it constructivly and not in disputes.
  • 4.If another editor marks my article for deletion, notability, etc, I will not attack them, instead I will put a comment explaining myself on the discussion page.

As I say it is up to you.--law-enforcement-type-of-guy 00:08, 26 April 2007 (UTC)law-enforcement-type-of-guy 00:10, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Janejellyroll" — Preceding unsigned comment added by Harebag (talk • contribs)

My response is here -- Mufka (user) (talk) (contribs) 00:26, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for the quick reversion of the vandalism to my user page. Much appreciated.  :) --SECurtisTX | talk 23:00, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

I also like to say thanks lOL, even though that random user didnt technically vandalise my page in a negative way haha. If i remember correct only admin's can give out awards true? P.S ur revert was very very quick, how did u find it so quickly as it just came on 1 second n next time i refresh u removed it? Either way good job. Cya petze 14:23, 1 May 2007 (UTC).
Cool, thanks for clearing up all that man. Good to know, there are softwares such as that antivandal tool, that can be used to detect vandalism. Keep up the great work. Cya petze 15:06, 1 May 2007 (UTC).

What Happened?!

A couple days ago AmiDaniels EditCounter said I had 398 edits in all namespaces now it sez 361 edits in all namespaces!!!!!!! What happened to all my edits?! HELP! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Harebag (talk • contribs) 22:35, 1 May 2007 (UTC).

My response is here -- Mufka (user) (talk) (contribs) 22:57, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

Sorry

Just trying to bring some humour into editing. Won't do it again.

Eugenespeed 09:57, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

WHAT?!

You mean when I mark newpages for deletion and they get deleted my edits disappear? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Harebag (talk • contribs) 00:04, 4 May 2007 (UTC).

Hey

Where do I get a link to check the backlogs of things like new users, most vandalised pages, etc?69.145.163.26 18:48, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

My response is here. -- Mufka (user) (talk) (contribs) 20:20, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

Help

I need some help. I use archives and I either blanked my page or my account was hacked. I don't remember blanking my archive page. I would appreciate it if you cound restore it here. I know I have had tools like twinkle but when I log on none of my scripting works.Wiki-wikify 21:30, 10 May 2007 (UTC) Sorry about the mix up. I was able to revert my blanked archive page.69.145.163.26 21:49, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

Genghis Khan School of Debauchery? Mufka 15:25, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

Many people of Asian descent may find this particular analogy racially offensive. To many people of particular Asian ethnic origins Genghis Khan is revered as great warrior and leader who created one of the largest and most important empires in world history. The contributions of the Mongols eventually had a considerable positive impact on the cultural, political and social development of Central Asia, East Asia and Asia Minor. I think a more racially neutral analogy may be a wiser choice. Thank you Ngo Quyen 16.05.07

Thomas Jefferson is revered as a great leader but he held slaves. I'm sure that you understand that truth is an absolute defense in libel law. Anyway, my analogy made my point. -- Mufka (user) (talk) (contribs) 17:23, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

Yes I do agree with the jurisprudence principle of absolute truth as a defense in libel law and one could just as easily use the analogy: the Thomas Jefferson School of Antebellum Southern Plantation Management awarding a PhD in the Abolition of Slavery, and made the same point. I was simply pointing out that any historic figures' contribution to the development of civilization when viewed in the context of the fog of history can either be held in great esteem or diminished as a villain according to ones nationalistic ideology and ethnic identity. Thank you Ngo Quyen 16.05.07

October 18

Hi, I have noticed that you have reverted the article October 18, I have actually reverted the same thing out of that article about three of four times before, you may have to keep an eye out, becuase the person who does this also tries to creat an article about ann pham or whatever here name is. Thanks--AdamJWC 03:38, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

David J Silver

I see you've met David Silver, aka user:Harvardlaw, user:CIA Girl, etc. While his claims change, the ego remains the same. ·:·Will Beback ·:· 20:04, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

The thought had occurred to me when I googled David Jason Silver and found the HarvardLaw AN page. -- Mufka (user) (talk) (contribs) 20:10, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
I just found this page: "World Famous Silver Kid", "Occupation: Movie star". I think the phrase is: "A legend in his own mind". ·:·Will Beback ·:· 20:15, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

Re:Thanks

No problem. :-) --Ispy1981 21:42, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

RE:Last warning

No, I did this because the user vandalised the page again just a minute later after your warning. Thanks trying to help anyway. Francisco Tevez 18:55, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

Thanks

I left multiple last warnings so people could see how much vandalization the user had done. Thanks for the tip! Cheers, JetLover (Talk) (Sandbox) 00:52, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

A7? Not quite

I don't think Bryan Styble meets CSD A7; it asserts notability multiple times. Feel free to prod it if you don't think it is notable enough. Picaroon (Talk) 20:16, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

Your recent comments

Why did you leave this comment? I did nothing wrong! Kindly remove your comment!71.246.123.180 23:14, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

John F. Youth

I don't know of any speedy criteria for fictional characters. Corvus cornix 03:30, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

Ther are too many people who will just run in and delete a db tag solely on the basis that there is nothing at WP:CSD which allows a speedy deletion for the subject matter, without bothering to change it to an AfD. So I didn't want to have to go through the trouble, since I was expecting it to happen. Corvus cornix 03:36, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

Hi... thanks for cleaning up the mess I made on the 'April 25th' page, I was intending to show my girlfriend how wikipedia works, I was not intending to leave my dubious mark on the page - my bad, keep up the good work. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.11.140.170 (talk • contribs) 19:59, 18 June 2007

Lithia

Thank you for showing me the way. The company website is incorrect - I will get it corrected ASAP and will not update the Wiki page until it is and I can site the source. New here - but not to LAD. We have 109 stores now - shame on us for having an error on the Lithia.com website. Thank you - T

User Talk:84.104.123.100/ warning

Hey, thnx for the warning (see: talk: 84.104.123.100), but the changes made on the page of Robster1983, are made by me, Robster1983. For changes on my own User page, sometimes I don't feel like signing in, so my IPadress is visible then (IPadress 84.104.123.100). But I do appreciate it; it is nice to know that if somebody indeed did try to change my page (for whatever reason), that it is monitored by Wikipedians, and if necessary, a warning is put out. So even though this change was legitimate, a big thnx, for you did do the right thing! :-) --Robster1983 13:37, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

2006

Not notable? I would say that Bush applying Geneva Conventions to the detainees is huge. Not that he really has of course. I admit that I made a mistake and put 2007 instead of 2006 though. 199.125.109.51 05:44, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

An argument could made that it is notable. But when I ask myself, "will it be notable in 50 years", I'm just not sure. -- Mufka (user) (talk) (contribs) 18:37, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
Uh delete it in 50 years then, if it is no longer notable. That's a very simple solution. I say it is highly notable today. 199.125.109.51 15:33, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

September 1

Sure, I am happy to do what I can. I have no particular axe to grind with regard to US matters so I may be able to look at the dispute from a neutral point of view. Not having done such a thing before, do you know if there is a normal protocol; do I just post to the discussion and offer to assist in forming a consensus or is there some set way of doing things? --Drappel 19:08, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

I have had my say, we will now see if people agree. --Drappel 21:52, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

Thank you.

For the revert on my userpage. Boy, my pages have been seeing a lot of action lately. :) --Ispy1981 15:36, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

Stephens City

Don't mess with something you no little to nothing about. I have written authorization from Newtown History Center to publish that with references. Also, don't put pointless "copyright violation" templates on my talk page. Why not improve Wikipedia instead of trying to shut me down at each corner. - NeutralHomer T:C 19:18, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

It's a little funny, I was just in the about 2 1/2 hours ago, told them who I was and what I was working on, spoke to the historian and she had no problem with me using the information, since she was the one who gave me the written permission. So....exactly what crap are you trying to tell me now? - NeutralHomer T:C 19:29, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
I'm sure that you understand that there are processes and rules that need to be followed. I'm encouraged by your spirit as an editor but I think it would do you well to review some of the rules. I'm here to help if I can. -- Mufka (user) (talk) (contribs) 19:44, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

July 21

You should be careful about your edits on July 21... you're coming very close to WP:3RR. — PyTom 17:49, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

I have no fear of being admonished for violation of WP:3RR by any prudent and thoughtful admin. Reverting vandalism is a clear exception and the edits to the July 21 article clearly violate the guidelines set forth for that Wikicalendar article as relates to the posting of future events. I am especially confident in my actions because I am not the only editor who sees it necessary to regularly revert those types of entries. -- Mufka (user) (talk) (contribs) 18:11, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

Stephens City

I was asked to provide permission, I did. Then I am told there was no permission provided, this is a blantant lie. Forward an email via my email link and I will forward you the permission from the Newtown History Center. - NeutralHomer T:C 19:33, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

Do you know how long it will take the Communications Committee to give a yes/no answer? Since the email/permission is directly from the Newtown History Center (their email address, replied to mine, forwarded to Wiki) I don't think it will be a problem, but until I know what is going on, I don't want to start anything else on the page and I have alot that still needs to be done.
Right now, I am working with the Virginia Historical Society to get some information on the charter/founding, among other topics on Stephensburgh (later Stephens City). I might actually make a trip down there.
So, I am honestly trying to add all the possible references and sources. Things are just moving slowly, which is teh part that bugs me, I guess. So, please don't think I am edit warring or 3RR'ing, I am honestly trying. After I sent it yesterday, I readded "in good faith", since the permission had been sent in. It was me being an "ass", just getting the information back up while the process was ongoing. - NeutralHomer T:C 21:22, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
Could be hours or days but most likely less than a week. -- Mufka (user) (talk) (contribs) 22:33, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

Cheyenne Kimball

Please read WP:MOSBIO#Names before removing a name from a biographical article. Ward3001 01:36, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for courteously pointing out my mistake. I had reverted from 141.157.223.216's contribs list and I missed your revert. -- Mufka (user) (talk) (contribs) 02:21, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

Hello Mufka,

I just wanted to give you a quick update on the status of the bot: I did file a request for approval with the bot approvals group as required by our bot policy (this isn't a task my bot was previously approved for) and started writing the code for the bot. It was then helpfully pointed out to me that the same result could be achieved using some rather clever template parser functions that modify the link based on the current date. Since that solution is far more elegant and also easier on the servers, I withdrew my request.

I would be happy to help replace the NYT links with the template, if there's consensus that this should be done. I think a next good step would be to bring this to the attention of the Days of the year WikiProject. What do you think? Cheers S up? 17:30, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

Stephens City, Virginia

Have you heard anything else on the confirmation front? I still haven't recieved anything from ComComm and I really want to start working on the page. If you could find something out and let me know, I would appericate it. Take Care and Have a Good Weekend....NeutralHomer T:C 07:54, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

I will go over there tomorrow (when I go out and do my normal errands and see if they can't do it that way. My thing is, I don't want to annoy these people and they retract the permission because of the annoyances of Wikipedia. - NeutralHomer T:C 08:45, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

Your Bot Request

You may or may not be aware that S withdrew his request for bot approval that would serve your request, seeing as I created a template that would solve the presented problem just as well. The template is here, and an example of its use is here. Let me know if you need help creating a duplicate template or implementing it on the Wikicalendars, and please let me know when I can delete my own copy.

Thank you, — Madman bum and angel (talk – desk) 00:22, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

July 18

I noticed that you deleted a recent addition to events on July 18. I had nothing to do with that edit, but it seems to me that the event you deleted is significant enough (only 16 perfect games in the first 100+ years of baseball), plus there is no other entry in 1999. If in 2009 someone is looking for a "10 years ago today" item, why not give them this? It seems like this event is sufficiently notable to me and I will add it back, but if you feel strongly and want to re-delete it, feel free to do so. -- DS1953 talk 22:51, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

Vandalism from this IP address

Thanks for your message which I encountered while browsing Wikipedia this morning.

This IP is in use by a large office building in Glasgow, Scotland. I have no hope of establishing which employee here is actually responsible for the vandalism you have had to revert. However judging from other messages directed at this IP, it is a recurrent problem; so if you have any ability to prevent this IP from making any further edits to Wikipedia I would encourage you to go ahead and do it.

Yours, A concerned Glasgow office worker. 195.43.48.132

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Mufka/Archive_1&oldid=1190099059"