User talk:Muddlet3

James Reginald David Durrant "Bun"

As they say in the movies, "oh be-have". Seriously, though, we are trying to write an encyclopedia here, so don't make joke edits. Some readers looking for a serious article might not find them amusing. Remember, millions of people read Wikipedia, so we have to take what we do a bit seriously here. If you'd like to experiment with editing, try the sandbox, where you can write whatever you want (as long as it's not offensive). Maybe you should check out Wikipedia:Bad Jokes and Other Deleted Nonsense.

Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! ^(Whisper...) 13:55, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Poo

Tom Muddle

The article Tom Muddle has been or soon will be deleted from Wikipedia. This happened because the article seems to be about a subject but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. You might also want to read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 7 under Articles. NawlinWiki 15:07, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:NewTheatreOXF.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:NewTheatreOXF.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 20:17, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

your edit to frog

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. --Ixfd64 09:58, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

Please stop. If you continue to vandalise Wikipedia, as you did to The Oxford Playhouse, you will be blocked. Orbicle 11:21, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:PowerCorruptionLies.JPG)

Thanks for uploading Image:PowerCorruptionLies.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 12:26, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bebo

When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field, especially for big edits or when you are making subtle but important changes, like changing dates or numbers. Thank you. --Mel Etitis (Talk) 18:15, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Bebo23-3-07.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Bebo23-3-07.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:13, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image talk:Sjurs.jpg

Edits like this are vandalism, and will lead to your being blocked if repeated. --Mel Etitis (Talk) 12:23, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:GWay.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:GWay.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 18:07, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Gerard Way

There is no need to constantly change the picture of Gerard Way. We've had enough of people changing it every five minutes. The page is semiprotected for a reason -- to prevent vandalism, considering the current picture has been up several times in the past, and you've been changing it for no apparent reason, I am pretty sure it is also considered vandalism. Don't do it, the picture doesn't need to be changed. There is already a discussion about this on the talk page, we do not need new pictures, and we are fine with the current one. I've noticed you have a history of vandalism before. Watch your act, or you'll be in trouble with the administrators. Unconscious 15:01, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry. I just thought that the new picture was more suitable, seeing as how the previous one was from the Three Cheers for Sweet Revenge days.

Don't worry about it. It's just a bit stressful when the picture gets changed every five minutes. Unconscious 13:09, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:GWay.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:GWay.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rette tast 17:58, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

October 2007

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to User:Kusma, you will be blocked from editing. – sgeureka ^t•c 15:16, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Haha. Go away. He's a n00b anyways

January 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Bicester Community College, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. -- roundhouse0 (talk) 16:54, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

March 2008

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Arthritis, you will be blocked from editing. Epbr123 (talk) 09:23, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

and stay out.

Message from the My Chemical Romance task force

Hello!

You may be interested to know that the WikiProject My Chemical Romance has recently been transformed into a task force of WikiProject Emo. Please visit the task force page to see what's new. This move allies the task force with a larger WikiProject that handles much of the administrative overload, thus allowing task force members to focus on the most important activity: article improvement.

The project's membership list has also been moved to the new task force page. If you see that your username is in the "Inactive/former members" section, please do not take offense; this is because you no longer appear to be active on Wikipedia. We may also take the liberty of removing the member userbox from your userpage if it appears there, to prevent you from automatically appearing in Category:My Chemical Romance task force members. Of course you are free to rejoin the task force and re-add the userbox at any time if you would like to become active again.

For active editors, it is our hope that this change will help spur you to improve articles related to My Chemical Romance. You may have noticed that the old My Chemical Romance project userbox on your user page has automatically changed to the new task force userbox. We may take the liberty of fixing the template link on your userpage, to avoid redirects.

Thank you and we hope you will continue to support the My Chemical Romance task force!

--IllaZilla (talk) 02:36, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]