Jump to content

User talk:Muchness/2006-01

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


The Real People

Hi, Thanks very much for tidying things up. Jud 00:53, 4 January 2006 (UTC)

Thanks!

Hello! Thanks very much for the barnstar. Most kind of you! Perodicticus 19:25, 4 January 2006 (UTC)

You're welcome, and my compliments again on an excellent rescue job. --Muchness 22:00, 4 January 2006 (UTC)

Thanks

Copied from my talk page

Hi, I just wanted to say thanks for the patience and consideration you've shown on 5aret's talk page. I'll try to follow your example if I come into editorial conflict with a newcomer again. Regards, Muchness 07:04, 7 January 2006 (UTC)

Not a problem :-). It's all part of the welcoming committee, even though I like to take a much more active role than some people. JHMM13 (T | C) 15:26, 7 January 2006 (UTC)

ArbCom Vote

Hi Muchness,

As per your opposition vote to my ArbCom candidacy due to the lack of questions, I've elaborated on my statement and explanation at the questions page. I welcome any further questions to be asked to clarify any of your doubts, and let me know on my talkpage if it's urgent. Thank you for your interest! :)

- Best regards, Mailer Diablo 02:53, 10 January 2006 (UTC)

check my IPA please on Joe Rokocoko

I've corrected the change you've made ipa pronounciation of rokocoko. Particularly the last two vowels and the use of the voiceless dental fricative.

however still not very confident with my IPA usage, apprecate if you could have a look and make sure its correct — Preceding unsigned comment added by Xorkl000 (talk • contribs)

Hi, re Joe Rokocoko - I based my IPA transcription on Joe's pronunciation of his own name, which you can hear here: [1] (scroll down to the clip labelled "See All Blacks Keven Mealamu, Aaron Mauger, Joe Rokocoko and Greg Somerville front the fans at an adidas store visit in Melbourne" - it's about 50 seconds into the clip).
I feel Joe's pronunciation of his name should take precedence, even if it's technically incorrect. --Muchness 04:38, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
thanks, but strongly disagree, i've heard him pronounce his name on radio here in fiji, and he pronounces his name correctly, am reverting --Xorkl000 04:44, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
Not a problem, and thanks for the correction. I may add a footnote to the article to cover the common mispronunciation. Can you add stress marks to indicate correct stress? Thanks and regards. --Muchness 04:51, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
thats one of the things i wanted you to check, my IPA is not that strong. Stress is on the second last sil --Xorkl000 05:34, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
No prob, added the stress. And thanks again for the correction. --Muchness 05:45, 12 January 2006 (UTC)

AfD Carry On Please

Are you aware of any reason why the above AfD (which I think you bought forward?) would be locked? Have just been trying to vote on it and cant get it... Cheers Jcuk 18:41, 18 January 2006 (UTC)

D&D format

I like your change in format for lead-ins to D&D articles: "In many campaign settings for the Dungeons & Dragons role-playing game. . . ." You should post it to Wikipedia:WikiProject Role-playing games--I noticed you're not listed there. You help would be welcome. Robbstrd 02:04, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

OK, will do. --Muchness 02:06, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

History of Laos

Thanks for your attention to these articles. Adam 01:54, 8 February 2006 (UTC)

You're welcome. --Muchness 02:09, 8 February 2006 (UTC)

Superheroes RFC

Hi, I added an RFC under Media for this, but would you like to look at it also? At Talk:Marvel_Super_Heroes_(role-playing_game) There is a short discussion about whether to include a price/product list on the article main page. This list was deleted once but now it's back. Should it stay or go? Oh, and I hope this is the correct way to leave a message for you. Markspace 00:31, 15 February 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for the heads-up. I'll take a look and offer my 2 cents. Regards. --Muchness 03:08, 15 February 2006 (UTC)

WP:CVG image blanking

Hi, re your edit here, the image was blanked because it's against Wikipedia policy to include fair use images outside the article namespace. --Muchness 08:47, 18 February 2006 (UTC)

Oh I see. Thanks for the info. Perhaps a game cover placeholder, instead. Unless there's already one in use elsewhere, maybe I should look into that. Tertiary7 20:50, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
No problem. A placeholder image is a good idea and probably preferable to what's there now. --Muchness 21:06, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
Actually, is this really the case. Cover box images seemed to be commonly used outside article namespaces when used as reference for infoxes, here, and here. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Tertiary7 (talk • contribs) 08:17, 26 February 2006.
The policy guidelines are pretty clear about this – see WP fair use policy #9. I've deleted the images on the pages you linked to and left a note raising the issue on the article talk pages. --Muchness 23:19, 25 February 2006 (UTC)

Nietzsche

Thanks for moving my comment. I think I must have been really tired... Theshibboleth 07:24, 25 February 2006 (UTC)

No problem :) --Muchness 14:09, 25 February 2006 (UTC)

Closer To Truth

Thanks for cleaning up Closer to Truth -- I should've known to do that, and now (hopefully) I do -- thanks again! ArglebargleIV 09:29, 26 February 2006 (UTC)

You're welcome. --Muchness 09:38, 26 February 2006 (UTC)

Devdas (disambiguation)

Hey, I saw your edits and I want to question one thing. You stopped hiding the disambiguation parts of the title... is that really part of the MoS.... because that's incredibly stupid. It now says "Devdas (1955 film), 1955 film"... which is completely redundant and the reason I made it say "Devdas, 1955 film" is because it gave me the opportunity to properly format a disambiguation. Can you show me where in the MoS it says to do that... because, if it really does then I think that's really a stupid idea. gren グレン 14:01, 3 March 2006 (UTC)

Hi, see Wikipedia:Manual of Style (disambiguation pages), specifically the guideline on piping. The purpose of a dab page is to let the reader choose between several articles with the same title, and the parenthetical clarifier helps to disinguish them. Regards. --Muchness 19:12, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
I read it... I removed the redundant date and film... personally I think it should be piped if it can be explained well with a link to it.
Both get across the same thing... the first is prettier. But, you at least agree with my edit removing the redundancies, no? gren グレン 19:34, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
Yes, the page looks fine to me. Regarding your alternate piping suggestion, you should probably avoid this because it would make the page inconsistent with other dab pages. You can suggest the alternate method of piping at the MoS:DAB talk page. --Muchness 19:46, 3 March 2006 (UTC)

WikiProject C++

The WikiProject C++ aims to increase the quality of C++-related articles on Wikipedia, and has discovered that you have participated in the editing of them! So don't hesitate, join us! --Deryck C. 15:36, 11 March 2006 (UTC)

Borderlands

Why do you keep removing my link?.... Borderlands is not only a collection of numerous places to Role-play, but it's a resource for role players. Look under role-playing resources at our site and you'll find glossaries of role playing terms, players manuals for helping people learn to role play, and FAQs about role playing. Please stop removing the external link, it has just as much right there as the rest of the external links. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Truemper (talk • contribs) 21:30, 14 March 2006

(moving to Talk:Role-playing game#Borderlands) --Muchness 08:58, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

Chuff guff

Why the hell did you remove 'chuff guff' as a euphemism from the vaginal flatulence page?? Whats wrong with it, its as valid as vart and pussy fart! You think you're being smart and/or clever by removing it?? 82.46.11.193 14:34, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

Hi, please see Wikipedia's notability guidelines and what Wikipedia is not. Wikipedia articles should not include slang terms, unless they are in notable usage. The term "chuff guff" returns 20 hits on Google, which leads me to believe it is not notable enough to warrant inclusion in the article. Regards. --Muchness 14:46, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

Protologism

Hey Muchness. As you put the prod2 notice on Protologism, I thought I should inform you of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Protologism. Proto||type 16:26, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for the heads-up. --Muchness 16:34, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

Eberron

Hey. I was tidying a bunch of articles on the minutiae of the fictional world of Eberron, and thought it would be good if the article explained why we're bothering to mention "Silver Flame", etc in the first place: namely, the fact that they're from an award-winning setting. The information as to who created Eberron (and its concomitant minutiae) seems equally appropriate for inclusion; however, clearly you disagreed. Might I ask what was your reasoning on this point? DS 14:59, 16 March 2006 (UTC)

Hi, I edited them for two reasons: precedence and my interpretation of the Wikipedia:Lead section guidelines. Firstly, in existing articles about aspects of D&D campaign settings (for instance, Forgotten Realms articles), it is not established practice to state the author of the setting and the reason(s) for the setting's notability in the article's lead sentence. Secondly, my feeling was that the extra qualifiers about the awards and author worked against the WP:LEAD guidelines, which state that the lead sentence "should be a concise definition of the topic". My opinion is that an official D&D setting is intrinsically notable, given D&D's preeminent status within the RPG community, but if you feel that some additional assertion of contextual notability is necessary for these articles, perhaps you could voice your concerns on Wikipedia:WikiProject Role-playing games? Regards. --Muchness 15:34, 16 March 2006 (UTC)

Protologism

Hi. There's really nothing wrong with redirects, even if an article has been AfD'd. Especially in situations like this, where the article has 50+ inbound links, a redirect can be rather useful. You might see Wikipedia:Redirects for Deletion, but creating a redirect where there used to be an article isn't anything speedy deletable. --W.marsh 01:11, 27 March 2006 (UTC)

DaGizza's RfA

Thanks!

Hi Muchness/2006-01, thank you for supporting me in my RfA which passed with a tally of (93/1/2). If you need any help or wish discuss something with me, you are always welcome to talk to me. GizzaChat © 11:48, 29 March 2006 (UTC)

Rockism barnstar

The Original Barnstar
I wanted to acknowledge a simple but aware, careful and effective edit to Rockism, as well as the helpful edit summary explanation.Tyrenius 03:26, 3 April 2006 (UTC)

Hi Muchness, I wanted to acknowledge your attention to detail and article effectiveness. I was very impressed with your edit, even though it was simple, and the explanation was also very useful.

Tyrenius 03:26, 3 April 2006 (UTC)

Bah

Maybe you could tell me what the problem is. You're the only one deleting links. I think you're just removing them so you can have your own site listed high. In the meantime I'll keep adding until another person removes or gives an actual reason besides consulting the manual, which I know well.}

-ip 71.11.209.105 —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.11.209.105 (talk • contribs) 02:28, 10 April 2006.

(moving discussion and replying on Talk:Role-playing game#Elite Skills Role Play) --Muchness 14:52, 9 April 2006 (UTC)

Protologism

When I created {{softredirect}}, my intention (explicited since the beginning on Category:Wikipedia:Soft redirects) was that articles should never receive it ("Do not add articles to this category."); the category is also a non-article category (which should not be used on articles but can be used on non-article pages). All the redirects from the article namespace using that template are historical artefacts (they were nonworking interwiki redirects, which I turned into soft redirects), which I'm working on eliminating.

Wikipedia:Soft redirect says explicitly that soft redirects to the Wiktionary should use {{wi}}; if it does not merit a {{wi}}, it should not have a soft redirect at all (MediaWiki:Noarticletext and MediaWiki:Noarticletextanon, which show when an article does not exist, already link to the definition on Wiktionary, so it can be found even without a redirect). There is nothing on Wikipedia:Soft redirect which says {{wi}} is only for articles "that could potentially be expanded to a Wikipedia article". Finally, I see nothing on the AfD and RfD that says the consensus is to use {{softredirect}}; the AfD result is a delete, and the RfD result was never announced (instead it was closed as "already turned into a soft redirect"); notice that both people who asked for a soft redirect never specified {{softredirect}}, and {{wi}} is also known as a soft redirect.

Because of all that, I'm reverting to the {{wi}} version, and undoing the changes to the intro of the category.

--cesarb 23:46, 12 April 2006 (UTC)

Hi, thanks for the explanation and my apologies for the misunderstanding. My objection to using the {{wi}} template was that it invites the user to start an article, when AFD has established that there should be no article in this case. Regards. --Muchness 05:54, 13 April 2006 (UTC)

Christopher Reeve

Providing vivid examples of the Christopher Reeve humor phenomenon is NOT turning the article into a jokebook. Would providing examples of Holocaust atrocities turn an article into snuff porn? I find it juvenile, ignorant, and inconsiderate for anyone to postulate otherwise. The examples included are neither unneccesary nor excessive. They merely drive the point home. I understand the need for concern over such a sensitive issue. On a personal level, I've dealt with these issues and can relate to your raising the question. However, by providing the reader with the truth, the honest truth, and yes...the AWFUL truth, the reader will henceforth be made privy to the full extent of the Christopher Reeve humor phenomenon. Does including a select few "inspirational" quotes make it an unbiased "love letter" to Christopher Reeve? Ask yourself these questions, and I will assure you that after much careful thought, you too will agree that the inclusion of examples of Christopher Reeve humor is both relevant and neccessary. A mere handful of examples as posted by me are in no way excessive. I've actually included a bowlderized version, as a close family member (closer than you'd care to know) lost the ability to walk. That person would agree that by raising the issue, one will be compelled to examine its effects on others as well as its implications on the very nature of man itself. Thank you kindly.

-H2C


The above paragraph was originally written by User:Hobson's Second Choice. It replaced the previous contents of the User page completely. I have reverted and added it to the bottom of the talk page instead. Thank you. Charm ©† 07:34, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

Request for IPA2

Hi! Nichalp (talk · contribs) told me to contact you. I have a request. Could you please see if you can create an IPA2 pronounciation of "Kolkata" in the article Kolkata? Thanks. Regards.--Dwaipayanc 09:31, 29 April 2006 (UTC)

PS. I do not know if it is already ok. Please see.--Dwaipayanc 09:32, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
Hi, the article's IPA transcription /'kolkat̪a/ is already ok – it matches the audio clip. --Muchness 10:48, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for taking the trouble to check the IPA of Kolkata. It's great that it was already ok. Bye!--Dwaipayan (talk) 14:18, 29 April 2006 (UTC)

About Adding a recipe to the 'Doughnut' article

I am curious about why adding a recipe is not acceptable. If I look up scones for example - I think finding a scone recipe would be useful - same as doughnuts, bread, shepherd's pie and so on. A single example recipe on any food item would be an excellent section. Why is this not acceptable?

Thanks.

- webchat —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Webchat (talk • contribs) 16:58, 17 May 2006 – 16:59, 17 May 2006.

Hi, regarding the "no recipes" rule, this has been quite a contentious guideline. See the discussions here and here for an overview of the arguments for and against. The current practice is to move recipes to Wikibooks:Cookbook. Regards. --Muchness 04:27, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
Thanks, I will now campaign to have a limited number of basic recipes included in the encyclopedia. While all variants go to the cookbook. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 66.82.9.61 (talk • contribs) 17:50, 17 May 2006.
You're welcome. --Muchness 04:53, 17 May 2006 (UTC)

Kiddush Club up for deletion

Hi, because you worked on the article itself, please see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kiddush Club (2nd nomination). Thank you. IZAK 11:27, 22 May 2006 (UTC)

Hi, thanks for the notice. My edits to this article were limited to some basic Manual of Style formatting tweaks; I don't have the specialist knowledge required to make an informed vote on this article and the related AFD discussions. I will do some research into the matter and cast a vote if I can reach a decision on the debate. Thanks again for the notice. Regards. --Muchness 13:10, 22 May 2006 (UTC)

FDR articles

Thanks for the clean-up help! Sam 00:22, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

No problem, and kudos for your excellent work in tidying up the article. --Muchness 00:24, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

FDR articles (Part 2)

Thanks for the feedback and input regarding external links. I was unaware. Valentimd 02:42, 24 May 2006 (UTC)

You're welcome, and thanks for understanding. --Muchness 02:58, 24 May 2006 (UTC)

Jake Gyllenhaal

Thanks for sorting that out - with all the edits that were being made, I couldn't see how far to revert back to. Cheers. Gretnagod 01:40, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

No problem :) --Muchness 01:42, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

Blnguyen's RfA

File:Atlanticpuffin4.jpg Hello Muchness. Thank you for your full support and gracious comment at my request for adminship which ended at the overwhelming and flattering result of (160/1/0), and leaves me in a position of having to live up to a high standard of community expectation. You can see me in action and observe what then happened as a result. If you need admin assistance, feel free to ask me. Naturally, if I make any procedural mistakes, feel free to point them out. I look forward to working with you in the future (probably a cricket article), hopefully as an admin. Blnguyen | Have your say!!! 02:55, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

Thanks! Nice technique you've just taught me. Appreciated. Dweller 13:34, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

You're welcome :) --Muchness 14:14, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

A haiku of thanks

Thanks for your support
In my RfA, which passed!
Wise I'll try to be.

Thanks for the positive comments about my disambiguation contributions, which mean quite a lot coming from a fellow disambiguator! Thanks again.

-- Natalya 03:53, 3 June 2006 (UTC)


Heightism Edit

It's ok. I have a real job. Happy finding sources!

-- klisteran

Bias Warning

Hi. Please see WP:BIAS. You have deleted certain content from Amber Benson for the stated reason that it does not meet WP:IUP, but additional image(s) in the same article meet no WP:IUP standards either. Please remain civil and don't resort to removing content simply because you do not like it. This is considered an edit war and is inappropriate for Wikipedia. If you continue to blank or remove content from Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.Cheeseypooofs 18:22, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

note: Cheeseypooofs (talk · contribs) is a sockpuppet of Cuthbert11 (talk · contribs) as confirmed by RFCU. --Muchness 07:53, 24 June 2006 (UTC)

i dont care

delete my imgae i dont give —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Duel me (talk • contribs) 05:31, 20 June 2006.

Note: this message was in response to my listing of an orphaned image at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion/2006 June 9 - diff. --Muchness 07:51, 20 June 2006 (UTC)

Thanks on Yeenoghu

Thanks for the cleanup on the Yeenoghu article. Still learning Wikipedia, so I know I made a few basic errors. Appreciate the edits! Kesh 22:25, 26 June 2006 (UTC)

You're welcome. --Muchness 04:47, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

dab formats

If you've got a moment, take a look at maggot. I like your reordering of the order that I tried to lay down on inspiration. "Maggot" is now getting an edit warring IP. My view (on talk:Maggot, is that most of what's in the dab doesn't belong at all, but I'm not an expert at the disambiguations and try not to read the MoS unless it's quoted at me. Geogre 16:28, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

I will have a look when I get a moment and offer my opinion. Thanks for bringing it to my attention. --Muchness 16:32, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Muchness/2006-01&oldid=1139275286"