User talk:Mtpisaman
March 2009
[edit]
{{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Donald Albury 15:33, 28 March 2009 (UTC)April 2009
[edit]
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Osteotomy. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Dawn Bard (talk) 00:40, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
Please do not remove content from pages without explanation, as you did with this edit to Osteotomy. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing. Andrewrp (talk) 00:41, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Osteotomy. Andrewrp (talk) 00:44, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Osteotomy. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Dawn Bard (talk) 00:46, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you delete or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did to Nurse practitioner, you will be blocked from editing. Dawn Bard (talk) 01:31, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
{{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 01:43, 28 April 2009 (UTC)Note that I have blocked User:149.68.105.207 as an obvious sock of this account. Kevin (talk) 03:06, 28 April 2009 (UTC)