User talk:Mtk180

Welcome!

Hello, Mtk180, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Atlas thon, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted (if it hasn't already).

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! ... discospinster _talk 01:50, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Atlas thon

A tag has been placed on Atlas thon requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guidelines for people and for organizations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. ... discospinster _talk 01:50, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

May 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from List of unusual deaths. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. JeffJ (talk) 15:07, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Stop changing dates on List of unusual deaths. Things that happened in 2000 are part of the 20th century. Per 21st century, "It began on January 1, 2001." — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 02:42, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of State patty's day

The article State patty's day has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:MADEUP

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ironholds (talk) 19:28, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Atlas THON

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Atlas THON requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Gurt Posh (talk) 09:31, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Atlas THON

Hi Mtk180, I saw the Atlas THON article survived a speedy deletion (it was not noticed earlier, but be careful with recreating deleted articles in the future, the article was created back in 2009 and speedily deleted shortly after). A few things will make the page better than it is now:

Provide citations for at least 'bold' claims: e.g. your claim in the first sentence that it is the 'world's largest' - these things need a source right after the sentence ends.
Name the URLs in your references: currently it is just bare links. To invite people to click on them, provide data on what is on the sites you link to. I did the first as an example.
Provide an image: make sure there is no copyright on it, maybe one from the dance event article itself would fit if you provide a suitable caption.

Feel free to ask if you want to know something. Kind regards, Pim Rijkee (talk) 10:31, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The original article, created in 2009, was a poor attempt at creating a Wikipedia article, with limited information and no citations. This is a much more robust article, including multiple independent references that demonstrate that the organizaion is legitimate and national in scale. Therefore, the original speedy deletion in 2009 should have no bearing on this version of the article. I have updated many of the references, including the addition of several more for the more "bold" claims. Let me know if there is anything else you think would make it a better page!

Problems with upload of File:Atlas signs.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Atlas signs.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 19:05, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

List of important publications in chemistry

Can you find a source that states that the book you have added to this list is the "defining reference" on electrochemistry? I know that we are rather bad on that list in giving references, but we should try. For many years, we have been having a debate on the talk page about each new entry. I was responsible for doing this. However there was a massive fuss on all these lists last year and I became unclear whether we should continue with that practice. This entry is the first new entry, I think, since then. I may ask on the talk page whether there is consensus for us to continue with the old practice. --Bduke (Discussion) 01:38, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I cannot actually find a reference that says that, other than my own experience in the field. Electrochemistry is a rather esoteric, older field of chemistry that is primarily analytical at this point, and this textbook (at least in my experience) is the standard reference text for all things electrochemistry. If this is not good enough, then I suppose you could remove it from the list, but since the list contained no other electrochemistry publications and there are few other landmark publications in electrochemistry in general, this seemed like an appropriate addition to the list. Mtk180 (talk) 02:17, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You are right. I could just delete it as original research. We really do need sources, not just your experience. I am not going to do so though, but I will, when I have time, look for sources that say somehting about the book and edit the entry to reflect those sources. You might try to do the same. I will raise the general issues on the talk page, again when I have more time. --Bduke (Discussion) 03:12, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Atlas Benefiting THON for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Atlas Benefiting THON is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Atlas Benefiting THON until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 01:04, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Atlas Benefiting THON

Hello, Mtk180. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Atlas Benefiting THON".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 22:06, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]