User talk:Mtierney01

Mtierney01, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Mtierney01! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Hajatvrc (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:17, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hey! This is my first time back on here since last Thursday. I like the "contact high" idea. I think we would be able to run with it well and i am sure there is a lot of information we can find on here to help. I will look around a little more though, and I agree about solidifying an idea, that way we can get a little bit of a jump on the game. see you at 2:30!! BMcInerney8792 (talk) 16:26, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Topic choice assignment

Relationship anarchy is not a good choice - There is almost no scholarly work on this topic, so there won't be much to add to this page. I also don't think that contact high will work well either, for lack of clear research and differentiation from other topics. I also think that hysterical contagion may be too specific. It is very similar to other related topics on Wikipedia and in just a quick Internet search I am seeing mostly references to one particular case. I don't think there is enough here for a really comprehensive Wikipedia treatment. I think the group attribution error article shows promise though.

When you refer to other Wiki articles, you should use the mark-up to link to them directly. For example social facilitation. Click the edit source on this page to see the mark-up for the link.Gseidman (talk) 22:04, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Article feedback assignment

Great comment on the social psychology talk page! You should consider following up to the response.Gseidman (talk) 22:04, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Adding reference assignment

Fantastic job! Not only were your references appropriate, but you also linked to other Wiki articles and really added important and relevant content.Gseidman (talk) 02:50, 25 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]