User talk:Mthibault/Archive 1

2007 Archive

Accept the facts

My poor "so called" fellow, i think you gives a high estimate to yourself saying "giving another chance". Do you really think i'm stupid enough to support my messages with anon edits? you should really reconsider yourself a take a deep fresh breath, otherwise it's paranoid you'll get. You should also follow cleary (as you said previously) follow Wikipedia policies before making any statements of users using anon edits. And one last thing, why did you blanked some of our previous conversations, do accept the facts, see i don't care about it and i won't put it back, better things to do, but next time don't pretend i blanked mine, i just don't want pollute my page leaving useless edits that doesn't worth a reading. Anyway just use Wikipedia (following the rights policies) to be contributive and not make a fuss, filling talks page and disturb administrators. Firstwind (talk) 11:52, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I regret that once more you twist facts and lie so blatantly. I would have hoped for another end. Mthibault (talk) 12:37, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

On a side note, I didn't blank anything, I removed a fake vandalism template (please review WP:Vandalism to learn what vandalism is) you put on my talk page as well as others' talk pages in a clear attempt at Cyber-bullying. This course was suggested to me by admin User:Ground Zero. You on the other end have receive at least 9 vandalism warnings by different editors and blank them all. Mthibault (talk) 12:47, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Opened a checkuser case about the user at Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Firstwind. Schcambo (talk) 14:57, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Edits about Broken Sword are none of your buisness, except if you wanna be part of it, join the discussion on BS not on my page. Who on earth do you think you are to ask me to remove the RC patroller sign, i don't ask you to remove it because it has absolutely nothing to do on your page. Firstwind (talk) 13:12, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Answer at : http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Firstwind&oldid=176143975 Mthibault (talk) 14:43, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nantes

How about "Regional rail" as the section title? If you understand, it's just that I think we should differentiate it from the commuter/suburban rail which is dealt with in the "public transport" section above it. I'm about to report the anon user to the admin noticeboard anyway. Schcambo 18:18, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It wouldn't be fair since Nantes only has one train station that connects the city to many places in France and Europe through TGV and at the same time to more regional destinations via "Corail Intercité". My main point is to bring some kind of homogeneity to articles regarding French cities (some use "intercity trains", other "rail" and yet other just "trains" to describe the exact same thing). I'm glad you took care of the anon user. Mthibault 14:29, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hadn't honestly noticed it until now; I've reverted it so we'll just have to see what happens I guess... Schcambo 16:58, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WP:ANI

I'm not an admni so I can't do anything about this, but I was pointing out a possibility. Looking above, however, I see the problem. An Admin will be along before long. --Rodhullandemu (please reply here - contribs) 20:41, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've commented on the Checkuser page; Firstwind isn't behaving according to WP policy, and if it persists, a block will be considered. Mind matrix 22:37, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your VandalProof Application

Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Mthibault. As you may know, VP is a very powerful program, and in fact the just released 1.3 version has even more power. Because of this we must uphold strict protocols before approving a new applicant. Regretfully, I have chosen to decline your application at this time. Please note it is nothing personal by any means, and we certainly welcome you to apply again soon. Thank again for your interest in VandalProof. β^_command 14:44, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]