User talk:MtPrincess

Blocked as a sockpuppet

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of BStudent0 (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 14:40, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MtPrincess (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Who the hell is BStudent0, and how am I associated with this account? I am an MMA fan, and I created an account yesterday to contribute to the talk pages of the destructed UFC Pay-Per-View articles, of which I am a daily user. I don't have an alternative account. I have no motive aside from what I stated, and that is reflected in the fact that my only contribution to Wikipedia thus far has been what I just stated. MtPrincess (talk) 17:25, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You, the person, are blocked from this project. Period. Someday you may be permitted to return, but continually creating new accounts will delay that by months (yes, I said MONTHS). You need to find a new hobby in the meantime. (✉→BWilkins←✎) 12:26, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MtPrincess (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

You are lying. I have only contributed to this "project" under one account, this one, which I created just a couple days ago. I have made no posts on no other accounts prior. I challenge you to prove the contrary. I sincerely regret donating my hard-earned money to an amateurishly operated project overseen by brash children. Never again. MtPrincess (talk) 18:39, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

That being the case, there's no reason to unblock. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 19:30, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

For reference, the relevant SPI case is archived at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/BStudent0/Archive#16 November 2012. Apparently the complaint was originated by someone with a similar username. ~Amatulić (talk) 23:33, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]