User talk:Msoamu

May 2013

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Markazu Saqafathi Sunniya, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Please stop - you are just back from a block, so it would be advisable for you not to go back to the type of editing that led to your block. Dawn Bard (talk) 20:01, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A large amount of content was removed with out tagging it for citation I am trying to improve that important page.Thanks for your advise.Obliged.Msoamu (talk) 20:07, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 20:19, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

hey

Accept my proposal at ANI it should hopefully give you leverage against the topic ban that has been proposed against you. Bring the issues to the articles talk pages and we can work out a consensus. Baboon43 (talk) 00:46, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Topic ban enacted

Pursuant to the discussion held here: [1], you are hearby banned from editing anywhere at Wikipedia regarding topics of a religious nature. The formal terms of the ban are as follows:

Msoamu is topic-banned from making edits anywhere on Wikipedia relating to religion, broadly construed, for a period of six months. For clarification, broadly construed means anything even slightly related to religion--this includes articles about religious leaders, groups affiliated with religious standpoints, history topics if the point being edited is related to religion, etc; it also includes other namespaces such as article and user talk pages. The following conditions are also applied:

If Msoamu violates the topic ban, he will be given escalating blocks, starting with 2 week blocks, with the six month topic ban being reset to the beginning of each such block.
If Msoamu socks to get around the topic ban (including clearly editing as an IP), he will given escalating blocks, and the topic ban will become permanent.
If Msoamu edits appropriately for the next six months, but continues the same disruptive behavior after the expiration of the topic ban, any admin may reinstate a new topic ban to be of at least one year.
Msoamu is strongly encouraged to obtain a mentor, ideally while the ban is still in place, so that Msoamu may be guided to editing that conforms with Wikipedia policies and guidelines.

Good luck and have a nice day. --Jayron32 05:27, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Muhammad Owais Raza Qadri

The article Muhammad Owais Raza Qadri has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No sources other than some lyrics websites, and no evidence that the subject ever won any awards or that the awards claimed are even real. Clear fail of WP:MUSBIO.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MezzoMezzo (talk) 09:54, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of All India Ulema and Mashaikh Board for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article All India Ulema and Mashaikh Board is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/All India Ulema and Mashaikh Board until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.MezzoMezzo (talk) 03:31, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

December 2013

Your addition to Anjuman-e-Talaba-e-Islam has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Dougweller (talk) 16:51, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

And most of Muslim Students Organization of India MSO is copy and paste copyright violation from the sources you used. Some, eg mention of a patron, was irrelevant. Dougweller (talk) 17:12, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for advising me and telling me about my recent editing,I will take care of it in future.Msoamu (talk) 09:34, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Repost of Muslim Students Organization of India MSO

A tag has been placed on Muslim Students Organization of India MSO requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion process. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's discussion directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead of recreating the page. Thank you. MezzoMezzo (talk) 18:04, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please could you cover the URLs in the article you created Muslim Students Organization of India MSO. This improves readability. One day it is possible the URLs of the sources you used will change; if we know the article title, author, etc. that the URLs refer to, we can probably find the new article URLs.--Toddy1 (talk) 23:16, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Muslim Students Organization of India MSO for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Muslim Students Organization of India MSO is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muslim Students Organization of India MSO until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 23:44, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ANI discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. MezzoMezzo (talk) 04:40, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a policy against usernames that give the impression that the account represents a group, organization or website, I have blocked this account; please take a moment to create a new account with a username that represents only yourself as an individual and which complies with our username policy. You should also read our conflict of interest guideline and be aware that promotional editing is not acceptable regardless of the username you choose.

If your username does not represent a group, organization or website, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice.

You may simply create a new account, but you may prefer to change your username to one that complies with our username policy, so that your past contributions are associated with your new username. If you would prefer to change your username, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice. Thank you. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 23:04, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that due to the nature of your account history, I have instated methods preventing you from creating an account on your own. If you wish to continue editing here, please use {{unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} to request a new username. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 23:16, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Topic Ban Reinstated

In accordance with the topic ban previously placed on you by the community, I am at this time reinstating a new topic ban on your account. You are, once again, hearby banned from any involvement on Wikipedia regarding topics of a religious nature. The formal terms of the ban are as follows:

Msoamu (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) is topic-banned from making edits anywhere on Wikipedia relating to religion, broadly construed, for a period of one year. For clarification, broadly construed means anything even slightly related to religion--this includes articles about religious leaders, groups affiliated with religious standpoints, history topics if the point being edited is related to religion, etc; it also includes other namespaces such as article and user talk pages. The following conditions are also applied:
If Msoamu violates the topic ban, he will be given escalating blocks, starting with 2 week blocks, with the one year topic ban being reset to the beginning of each such block.

If Msoamu socks to get around the topic ban (including clearly editing as an IP), he will given escalating blocks, and the topic ban will become permanent.

If Msoamu edits appropriately for the next year, but continues the same disruptive behavior after the expiration of the topic ban, a formal request will be filed for an indefinite community ban against Msoamu at WP:ANI.

Msoamu is, once again, strongly encouraged to obtain a mentor, ideally while the ban is still in place, so that Msoamu may be guided to editing that conforms with Wikipedia policies and guidelines.

Please be aware that this topic ban will carry over to your new account; the ban statement will be edited accordingly once you've decided on a policy compliant username. Thank you for your anticipated cooperation. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 23:41, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dear user:Coffee,Should I create a new I.D after it ? Kindly tell whether after creating

this new account and during my topic Ban ,I can bring a complain to ANI or not on previous matter?Msoamu (talk) 14:41, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Request for creation of new account

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Msoamu (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

new username (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

I wants the mentor ship of a senior editor and will edit non religious pages as I have created and contributed many Articles on new topics ,contributed positively to Wikipedia.I have saved from deletion and given sources to many Articles.I hope you will take my request in positive light..Kindly allow me to edit other topics as I am facing a topic Ban due to username policy.Msoamu (talk) 14:49, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Procedural decline per below. — Daniel Case (talk) 17:28, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You need to select a new username by replacing "new username" with whatever you wish to be called. "You will not find me involve in dispute with any other editor except one" isn't exactly promising. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 16:34, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Msoamu - I can see that the message above is a bit confusing.

Suppose that the new user ID you want is DIRegan. Suppose also that you could persuade MezzoMezzo to be your mentor. (He/she would be a very good mentor for you, by the way.) What you need to do is to post something like the following:

{{unblock-un reviewed | 1=DIRegan | reason=I wants the mentor ship of [[User:MezzoMezzo]] and agree to only edit non-religious pages, and to avoid disputes. If I think I am getting into a dispute I will ask MezzoMezzo's advice, and then do as he/she suggests - even if this means waiting some days for him/her to respond to me. I have created and contributed many articles on new topics, and contributed positively to Wikipedia. I have saved some articles from deletion, and provided sources to many articles. I am sorry for past misdeeds, and am confident that as long as I have MezzoMezzo to advise me, I will do better in future.}}--~~~~

--Toddy1 (talk) 21:42, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Toddy1,actually in previous message I could not mention your name but I wish you accept my request to be mentor.I hope I will learn a lot.Msoamu (talk) 18:20, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Msoamu (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

Wikieditoronline (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

I wants the mentor ship of Toddy1 and agree to only edit non-religious pages, and to avoid disputes. If I think I am getting into a dispute I will ask Toddy1 advice, and then do as he/she suggests - even if this means waiting some days for him/her to respond to me. I have created and contributed many articles on new topics, and contributed positively to Wikipedia. I have saved many articles from deletion, and provided sources to many articles. I am sorry for past misdeeds, and am confident that as long as I have Toddy1 to advise me, I will do better in future.

Please include a decline or accept reason.

--Msoamu (talk) 18:20, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I do not think that User:editpoint is a good choice of user name on Wikipedia. The "word" does not suggest a name in the English language; this makes it confusing. In addition it suggests a process. Identities such as User:featuredcontent, or User:uploadfile, or User:help would be confusing for the same reason.--Toddy1 (talk) 11:47, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I did not think from this point of view.Yes you are right I am changing it.Msoamu (talk) 16:40, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Mentorship

If you want me to agree to mentor you, we need to discuss how this would work. Maybe you could think about this. Please have the discussion here. It needs to be in the open.--Toddy1 (talk) 11:47, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I think User:Wikieditoronline will be fine for me.What do you say ? Msoamu (talk) 16:40, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Toddy1 I want to learn to write good Articles on Wikipedia on new and important topics of politics,law,geography ,sociology etc.I wants to avoid dispute and as in the past your efforts ,as I have seen were great towards reaching mutual consensus.I will abide by your suggestions and would like to follow them.Any other further necessary point you may suggest me,I will gladly welcome them.Msoamu (talk) 16:40, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Muhammad Owais Raza Qadri for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Muhammad Owais Raza Qadri is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muhammad Owais Raza Qadri until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Musa^Talk ☻ 15:41, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Syed Muhammad Qadri in Mawlid, Jaipur,India.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Syed Muhammad Qadri in Mawlid, Jaipur,India.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:19, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Msoamu/sandbox

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:Msoamu/sandbox requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://www.markazonline.com/history/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. David.moreno72 10:11, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]