User talk:Mseliw

Welcome!

Hello, Mseliw, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!

Hello User:Mseliw. I noticed you've been nominating some articles for deletion, and I thank you for helping keep Wikipedia free of un-needed articles. I think it would do you well to look at the speedy deletion policy, as a full AFD debate is often not necessary. Happy editing Someguy1221 16:22, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Personal Representative

Personal Representative (CSRT) is always captitalized in the original transcripts.
All the dozens of other instances of this term, in the wikipedia's coverage of Guantanamo, are capitalized.
The other officers of the CSRT and ARB, like the Recorder, Tribunal President (CSRT), Presiding Officer, Assisting Military Officer, Designatated Military Officer are always capitalized.

Cheers! Geo Swan 22:39, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Rupal Valley

Could you take a look at this article? It seems that it needs a bit added to the last sentence to make sense. Thanks. Mseliw 23:12, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for pointing that out, there was a coordinates tag at the end of the sentence which wasn't written properly by me so the coordinates didn't show up. I've tried to fix it, it shows up but it's still messed up. User:Waqas.usman (Talk) 05:36, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Page blanking

Please do not replace Wikipedia pages with blank content, as you did to Michael Bistacchi. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. If it is a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If the page has been vandalised, please revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy for how to proceed. --Allen3 ^talk 18:25, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

SAT reply

I don't think it was me who had done this - though I can understand what was wrote, I'll change it. This is Drew (talk) 19:56, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:41, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]